Jump to content

Recommended Posts

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/tottenham

> -weigh-up-gamble-on-david-moyes-9281480.html

>

> Be surprised if it happened, as he gambled with

> AVB after a bad spell with one club preceeded by a

> great spell with another.

>

> But,I'm sure if you looked back at most big

> manager's histories there would be a dodgy spell

> that they moved on from and got stronger. So i

> think it's a bit early to say that Moyes is doomed

> to fail in the rest of his career just because he

> couldn't follow in the footsteps of the greatest

> manager this country, possibly the world, has ever

> seen.

>

> The pressure on Moyes to succeed at United was

> horrendous, especially after being handpicked by

> Ferguson. There'd still be pressure on him if he

> came to Spurs, but a different kind. He'd have

> pressure to succeed where others have failed- a

> better kind of pressure I reckon.

>

> I'd call it as not a bad option.


A lot of people said, even before Fergie retired, that the time to be Utd's manager was after the first one.

If I was a Spurs fan I would be worried about his general nagative demeanour and playing style, Spurs like Utd have an attacking tradition. Noises coming from OT is that he was more concerned about how to stop the opposition than Utd going forward. He was a defender as a player, I think it's just the way he is and he won't change.

I can see him going abroad to get out of the limelight like Steve Maclaren did, or maybe Celtic if Lennon moves south...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> A lot of people said, even before Fergie retired,

> that the time to be Utd's manager was after the

> first one.

> If I was a Spurs fan I would be worried about his

> general nagative demeanour and playing style,

> Spurs like Utd have an attacking tradition. Noises

> coming from OT is that he was more concerned about

> how to stop the opposition than Utd going forward.

> He was a defender as a player, I think it's just

> the way he is and he won't change.

> I can see him going abroad to get out of the

> limelight like Steve Maclaren did, or maybe Celtic

> if Lennon moves south...


Celtic have an attacking tradition too - so no thanks.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What happened to Van Gaal going to Spuds?

>

>

> you heard that Moyes got sacked yeah?


No really, well I never did, you're so well up on these things aren't you? So back to the question then. Van Gaal was never likely to go to Spuds while he had a hole in his arse is the most likely response.

Rafa plays boring football and doesn't change things (especially not in a positive way) when things need changing. I know he's much loved at Liverpool, and I think he's a good man, but his footy didn't do much for me.


Yes the champs league win was incredibly exciting, but he can hardly be credited with masterminding a second half come back from being 3-0 down.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't really see why they're insisting on

> experience at the top level. Giggs knows the club

> better than most, don't see why they don't just give him a go.


The same could be said of Tim Sherwood at Spurs. A clueless twonk in my opinion. Good luck to Giggs though.


He may not be the chosen one but he is the one who chooses to shag his brother's wife.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't really see why they're insisting on

> > experience at the top level. Giggs knows the

> club

> > better than most, don't see why they don't just

> give him a go.

>

> The same could be said of Tim Sherwood at Spurs. A

> clueless twonk in my opinion. Good luck to Giggs

> though.

>

> He may not be the chosen one but he is the one who

> chooses to shag his brother's wife.



Giggs has two important advantages over Sherwood- been at the club all his life and would have the respect of everyone. Guardiola anyone?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A Google search brought up eleven Chango  branches, although they don't all seem to be listed on their website. In the order they came up: East Dulwich, Clapham Common, Mayfair, Wandsworth, City of London, Wimbledon,  Parsons Green, Kensington, Highgate, Richmond, Hampstead. I think it is the positioning of this new branch that has mostly got to me. I accept that they would have to go for where a space became vacant, but Lordship Lane is pretty long, even just the part with shops in,  and choosing to  open a stone's throw away from Chacarero seems mean, to say the least. I wonder if they have made contact with Chacarero. It would be nice to think they had (in a friendly way, obviously!) As regards the apparently  marketing spiel, at least one of the online reviewers also refers to a Chango branch (the Parsons Green one in this case) as a "gem". Probably just coincidence and a word in common use to describe such places. I wouldn't know. I'm ancient 🤣
    • I like empanadas. I don't think Chango is a massive chain - it's got a few stores all in London I believe (stand to be corrected if I've got that wrong). I don't see a problem with them opening on the Lane personally. I really like Chacarero, but that doesn't mean that they should be immune from competition - if they're successful and open a couple more stores, are we then meant to stop supporting them for being a 'chain'?  That opening post does sound a lot like marketing spiel though. Is the OP perhaps connected to the new business I wonder?
    • According to what I can see online, Dynamic Vines and Cave de Bruno sell totally different kinds of wine to each other.  Dynamic Vines  "work with independent winemakers who produce outstanding wine using sustainable practices in the vineyard and minimal intervention in the cellar".  Cave de Bruno specialises in French wines and spirits from small independent producers. So two different USPs, and no doubt two different but overlapping customer bases who can afford these wines. Probably different again to the people mainly  shopping for wine at Majestic or the Co op. On the other hand, the two empanada shops appear on the face of it to be selling virtually identical products. But time will tell, won't it? Let's see how they are both doing in - say - a couple of years' time. Impossible, of course, to compare that with how they would have done if there had been only one of them. I just feel more  sorry for the original one than for  the one which can apparently already afford to have a number of shops in places like Mayfair and Highgate. I'm tempted to buy something there every week, and I don't even like that kind of pastry 🤣
    • Not only can he turn olive oil into Vermouth, but also water into a wine. A true miracle worker.  I wouldn't say a wine shop sells a wide variety of things - and there are two right next to each other.  And once upon a time, upmarket pizza shops were very specific. So were burritos etc. These Argentinian cornish pasties are clearly becoming mainstream; we should consider ourselves lucky to be witnessing this exciting upward trend within our lifetimes and on OUR HIGH STREET. We can tell our grandkids that we remember when there was no internet and no empanadas.  I'm sure that if the family empanada people have a good business head, they'll be able to ride this wave of competition, just like Bruno has. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...