Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, the real test is when Spurs play

> a halfway decent team.


I don't think that's holds true anymore. The PL is far more competitive than it used to be. If a team is going for the Championship then I agree they have to beat, or at least not lose to the other challengers, but as Chelsea found out last season, it's just as important to not drop points against the so called lesser teams...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/11054725/Are-big-matches-really-that-important-in-deciding-who-wins-the-Premier-League-title.html


On that subject it seems the team who does better against the top teams wins the league. Chelsea were an exception.


http://www.soccerstats.com/homeaway.asp?league=england_2014


United did well away from home last season if you look at the stats. So apart from an awful home record their season might have ended quite differently.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't see it but it's early days and you've got

> nine new players to bed in. That's two more than

> Spurs last season. So by my reckoning seeing as we

> finished sixth back then Liverpool will finish

> eighth.



What I like is that he's not throwing them all straight in. Last night's starting line up didn't look too unfamiliar. We were arguably the better side for the first half but made a couple of big errors which get punished by teams as good as City


And I have no bloody idea how Ague was allowed to score with his first touch about 25 seconds after coming on. Thought I was watching a replay or something.

From what I've seen of the 2 supposed main contenders for the title, the chavs and City, I'd say City look far superior. CSKA Fulham weren't convincing in their two gams against newly promoted sides, and while you could argue that City didn't overpower Newcastle and Liverpool, what they did do was take their chances with ruthless efficiency. For me, that is what will win the title.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and while you could argue that

> City didn't overpower Newcastle and Liverpool,

> what they did do was take their chances with

> ruthless efficiency. For me, that is what will win

> the title.



Agreed

Lampard has confirmed retirement from international football. Saw this comment on the BBC site which really made me laugh. If he really said that, I like him a bit more.


"Good effort Frank! met him the other day shortly after he arrived at City and says he's settled in well, adding: "I recognise many of the fans from when they supported Chelsea"

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lampard has confirmed retirement from

> international football. Saw this comment on the

> BBC site which really made me laugh. If he really

> said that, I like him a bit more.

>

> "Good effort Frank! met him the other day shortly

> after he arrived at City and says he's settled in

> well, adding: "I recognise many of the fans from

> when they supported Chelsea"


And most likely Yanited before that, and Liverpool in the 70's and 80's.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> not to mention a brief patch supporting

> Newcastle!! Where are all those shirts these days

> I wonder, unloved at the back of a cupboard?


Funny thing you mentioning old shirts, do you ever see anyone wearing a Chav shirt that pre dates 2003? Nah, me neither.

Out of the blue I know, but I feel really sorry for Sevilla. They always seem to get a decent team and then have to sell their best players. If they want fair play in Spain they should divide the TV money like they do here. It's virtually a two team league each season, apart from the last one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree, the people in the park office seem to be invisible. Quite why we need a park office I am not sure. Perhaps it is to do with all the maintenance and upkeep for which there will be organisation and admin. It may be expensive but I do think funding some sort of regular park safety oversight should be a priority. Southwark to want young people to use the park, as do we all, but there probably does need to be some sort of supervision for everyone's sake.  
    • The big difference, other than increasingly flaking paint, seems to be graffiti. The question is, will that/ can it be controlled?
    • I took back my 🤣 because I think the idea is unworkable expensive and would produce little result.  There seems to be people in the office next to the toilet but I don’t think they leave the office. I’m not sure what they do there.  The toilets have been in a disgusting state for months and months with many promises to repair they are not functional and they invite vandalism. I shall  try to add a couple of photos. The council doesn’t care why should we?
    • There will always be kids pushing the envelope as the saying goes, but having some boundaries should help most understand what they can and cannot do. I think dedicated, daily park wardens is exactly what is required...with a hotline to SNT teams on the beat. Is there no way money made from Gala or from Park parking fees can be diverted to provide that funding? I feel it would be a really good use of money. The principle aim being to maintain the park as a safe and relaxing environment for all. If funding really cannot be found I wonder if there might be funding to at least train volunteer park wardens?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...