Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pah! Bloody Arsenal noveaux supporters...what's

> wrong with sharpened pennies or a bog roll?

>

> http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/nov/23/ar

> senal-fan-sour-grapes-wine-thrown-manchester-unite

> d-bench


Well its been a grudge match since the 90's and you expect to see some claret spilt every now and again.


Anyway - as you cant drink within sight of the pitch, they must keep red wine in their hip flasks. Get a proper drink.

arsenal are turning into a joke i mean they have decent players but just cant get a win. maybe man utd are going to get a top 4 finish afterall and liverpool i dont know what is going on with them. chelsea definitely winning they are not going to lose that many points till the end of the season.
Yeah i definitely agree with that liverpool have a good bunch of player that can play good football its just they have lost there chemistry they are not playing fluid nice football like they were playing last season maybe due to the absence of sturridge and the lost of suarez who is such a good finisher and player. same situation with arsenal they have the player just cant play. need to learn how to play.

Also, Suarez's goals last year covered up the fact that we were conceding a ton. We're probably not conceding any more now, but we're not scoring at the other end.


In my humble opinion, Rogers needs to sort the defense out first, then start thinking about pretty football. Liverpool were a joy to watch last year, but right now we just need to think of points on the board before we can think about style.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where would City be without Aguero, he was

> stunning in last nights Champions League game

> against Bayern.


PD, nice diversion from you own team's deficiencies. Where would Arsenal be without Sanchez?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agreed he's a fantastic player. Where do you stand

> on this Wenger out nonsense?


It's a difficult one. He has done a tremendous amount for the club and the methods he introduced when he arrived are now being widely used by other clubs. He has left us a great legacy, what with the stadium etc. I'm not for sacking him but do feel it's time for a change. Exactly who we'd get in is open to debate. Rumours are rife about his successor, Klopp, Guardiola have been mentioned, I'd quite like Ancelotti. Can't see him walking away from Real though.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------



>

> PD, nice diversion from you own team's

> deficiencies. Where would Arsenal be without

> Sanchez?


Or conversely where would Arsenal be without Wenger.



ETA: whoops, only just noticed jah asking same.

Like I said I'm not for sacking him, but there have been times in the last few seasons when his tactical naivety has cost us dearly. Certainly some of the players need to shoulder the blame equally, and some should be moved on. But I really think we need a freshen up, but not by sacking him mid season. The club should, if it hasn't already, be looking at a long term successor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...