Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it's good that West Ham can mix it up by either keeping it on the ground or hitting the big man. Swansea aren't a tall, strong, physical side, so hitting more long balls to Carroll made sense, and paid dividends. That won't work against every team, think it might on the 28th though ;-)...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's good that West Ham can mix it up by

> either keeping it on the ground or hitting the big

> man.


Have to agree - the problem was always that BFS had ONE idea, one plan and one route to goal and no plan B. Ironically (given his talent) the only proper route-one goal was Sakho's. Just hope we can hang onto him. Worry for me is the Nolan/Carroll brand may take over when we lose Sakho, Song and Kouyate in Jan for the Africa Nations Cup.


Great crosses from Jenkinson btw - Wenger must be glad he kept Chambers.

Refs are making strange decisions regarding the advantage rule this season. During the City v Everton game, a City player was fouled slightly, remained on his feet still in possession and control of the ball, and unimpeded played a pass to another City player who then played a crappy pass that went straight to an Everton player. The ref pulled it back to the original foul presumably because he felt no advantage had been gained. How much advantage do they need?...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't worry Otta - jah and PD happy with their

> teams tippy-tappying to mid-table obscurity :)



West Ham fans getting overjoyed a third of the way through the season beacuse of their lofty position, yet forget they have been the butt of jokes for years. Make the most of it, it won't last.

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If Sakho had scored after Fabianski clattered

> into

> > him, would Fabianski still have been sent

> off?...

>

> Apparently not, according to the commentator


Probably because he hadn't been denied a goalscoring chance.

Ally McCoist offers his resignation from Rangers

Ally McCoist has offered his resignation as Rangers manager, BBC Scotland understands.


But, as it stands, he will be in charge for Friday evening's Scottish Championship fixture against Queen of the South - until told otherwise.


The 52-year-old has a 12-month rolling contract with the Glasgow club, who have yet to comment officially.


So either the club pays his salary up in full, comes to a settlement, or keep him in place for the next 12 months.


It is believed that the players have not yet been informed.



(That sort of assumes the players don't have access to the internet)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As it turned out after my post, the police have photos. And even if they didn't, the OP reported the incident to the police, who would have asked for a description.  However there are all sorts of problems with eye witness descriptions, which would just be multiplied with several kids involved. I stand by my post. Are you suggesting a full description of these kids should be posted on here so that ... what?  Vigilante action by forum members? And if there was mistaken identity? Then what? Even if there wasn't, there could be all sorts of background issues relating to this sort of anti social behaviour. It should be left to the police to find and  appropriately deal with  the perpetrators of criminal behaviour. The police are far from perfect, but the alternative just makes a general slide into lawlessness more likely.
    • Hi there, we’re on Rodwell Road and need some large + medium moving boxes - please message if you’re trying to get rid of some, we can collect. 
    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...