Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah arsenal should have signed him would have been perfect for them. :/ and if i remember correctly man city have not spent that much this season besisded Mangala from porto for 32 milliion and they have sold Jack Rodwell and Javi Garcia for around 10millions each. That is why they can spend 28 million on Bony.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How is football's Financial Fairplay Scheme fair

> when Manchester City can go out and spend another

> ?28 million on Wilfried Bony?


We (Swansea) have to pay 7% of that to Vitesse


I noticed the final fee was 'Undisclosed' - wonder if

we got a little more from City :)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How is football's Financial Fairplay Scheme fair

> when Manchester City can go out and spend another

> ?28 million on Wilfried Bony?



Agreed, seems like a few clubs will be driving a coach and horses through that scheme. I bet City think its very fair though.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well well, Defoe back in the PL on a 3.5 year deal

> with Sunderland!


So how many months, weeks or days do you think it'll be before Stevie G is "loaned" out to Liverpool next season?


(I give him just long enough to unpack)

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well well, Defoe back in the PL on a 3.5 year

> deal

> > with Sunderland!

>

> So how many months, weeks or days do you think

> it'll be before Stevie G is "loaned" out to

> Liverpool next season?

>

> (I give him just long enough to unpack)



Not long at all. Whole thing is stupid.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ernesto Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30846543

>

>

> Not the first time for us.....dodgy geeezers innit


Good timing though - touting for a new sponsor while a reasonably 'hot' ticket - should be worth more than Alpari.*



*word is BAC Windows have made an offer.....

So. first half for West Ham, Sam sticks Downing out on the wing and has everyone lumping it up to Carroll, we are outplayed and luck it's 0-0. second half he goes to the Diamond with DoWning central and we cream them, it's not Fooking rocket science everytime we play to his old dinosaur formation we look crap, yet he still has to try it nearly every game in the hope he's proved right I presume. Our squad with a decent manager would be right up there this season.


nice result Arsenal

You see our game SJ? We could have been three down at half term if Hull had some quality upfront. Nolan and Noble don,t work together and Downing goes back to lat year's innefective winger when he's bunged out there......but Sam knows best. Takes noble off and bring Downing in as every West Ham on the forums and that I talk to were sayingat kick off and hey presto, great movement, creativity and 3 goals, but Sam knows best.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
    • I think the accusation derives from the Greens mobilising the Muslim vote, hence engaging in sectarian politics. But happy to be corrected    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...