Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wot Quids said - i think Nolan should be got rid of now - he can't play in anything other than a lump-it-and-see style; Noble used in his stead is far more effective and works better with the rest of the midfield - not going to rehearse same old reasons most WH fans I know still want BFS gone, except to say there are still a lot of good things happening despite rather than because of his decisions.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Allardyce leaves

>

> West Ham fall. Fall. Fall

>

> Hack "managers" like Osborne get praise and

> "solid" managers like Sam get slammed?

>

> Fantasy world.


In my 'Fantasy World' we would have tried to entice Pardew back before he joined CP.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You see our game SJ? We could have been three down

> at half term if Hull had some quality upfront.

> Nolan and Noble don,t work together and Downing

> goes back to lat year's innefective winger when

> he's bunged out there......but Sam knows best.

> Takes noble off and bring Downing in as every West

> Ham on the forums and that I talk to were sayingat

> kick off and hey presto, great movement,

> creativity and 3 goals, but Sam knows best.....



http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30872780

My "ungrateful bollix" phrase was intended as a Roddy Doyle-esque quip last night - but rereading it this morning it looks more like a straight insult, so I'm holding myhadns up here and offer an apology


It's odd me trying to defend BFS as I don't like the man very much but the vitriol lobbed his way constantly surprises me


Just as the Wenger Out brigade at my club appall me in their vitriol too...

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's hardly wenger is he!!! A man who instigated

> an entire revolution in football in this country.

>

> If anything he's the anti-wenger.



I thought SJ was saying that the vitriol each receives from their own fans was comparable, nothing to do with their managerial skills/legacy.


I think sometimes too much credence is given to systems/formations. 10 mins of watching Sky punditry and everyone is suddenly a tactical genius. I watched the game, West Ham looked hungover and lethargic after the highs and exertions of their mid-week Cup win. Second best to 50/50's, the defence, in particular Tomkins, run ragged. It doesn't matter what system is played, if a team isn't up for it, they're not going to perform. Something a good old fashioned half-time rollicking and an orange put right. West Ham might have been in the top 4 with a different manager, but equally they could've ended up in the Championship if they had sacked him this time last year...

I don't think it's vitriol, it's two parts frustration erm, probably another two parts distaste.

He doesn't make me angry or hateful, he makes me depressed*


I reckon we should get that Setphanie Roche as the new gaffer. At least the post match interviews would be less stomach churning.


*pedro syndrome, everything good is my genius, everything bad is everyone else's fault

Its been an amazing turnaround at west ham - a matter of 6 months ago there was a big defeat and I thought BFS would be gone but he hung in there.


I'm surprised at Downing's transformation too - he looked fantastic in central midfield on MOTD.


BFS has to take the credit even if he does operate an unsophisticated plan A. And I agree the first half tactics looked a bit agricultural compared to the second half but maybe you have to soften the opposition up first.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> BFS has to take the credit even if he does operate

> an unsophisticated plan A. And I agree the first

> half tactics looked a bit agricultural compared to

> the second half but maybe you have to soften the

> opposition up first.


I'm sure that was the plan Mick.


''Don't worry lads, Hull's pressing game will eventually knacker 'em out by 'alf-time, then we'll stick to 'em in the 2nd 'alf...''


Tactical genius...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BFS has to take the credit




No he doesn't, he could give some to his players and his coaching staff (who probably have more to do with the good football they play than he ever will).


BFS doesn't HAVE to take the credit, but he will, every single time.


Cunt!

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Match Analysis

>

> 1st Half

>

> Quids Long ball

> BFS Tippy tappy

>

> 2nd Half

>

> Quids Tippy tappy

> BFS Long ball

>

> Both say the 2nd half was better but for

> completely different reasons.



Nope. I said players playing out of position and/or combinations that don't work - no mention of Tippy Tappy, which I've slagged off before. Sam's simplistic binary is the Strawman here...as EP would say

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have you read this Rangers article Mick?

> Quite a good overview of their financial

> shenanigans...

>

> http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/jan/18/ho

> w-the-mighty-glasgow-rangers-have-fallen

>

> I'm sure SC will correct any inaccuracies... ;-)


Had not seen it RD - very interesting and in some ways even I have to admit its somewhat sad - I think many thought that 4 seasons on and Rangers would be back to where they deserve to be fighting it out for the SPL next year - but more are now conceding it will be a long time before they are back at their level of past greatness, as evidenced by their struggle to keep up with Hearts this season.

Interesting table


England's 14 money league representatives from the the top 30 globally (revenues for 2013-14 season, in euros)



2. Manchester United (518m)

6. Manchester City (414.4m)

7. Chelsea (387.9m)

8. Arsenal (359.3m)

9. Liverpool (305.9m)

13. Tottenham Hotspur (215.8m)

19. Newcastle United (155.1m)

20. Everton (144.1m)

21. West Ham United (137.4m)

22. Aston Villa (133m)

25. Southampton (126.9m)

27. Sunderland (124.8m)

29. Swansea City (118m)

30. Stoke City (117.6m)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...