Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Todays news John Terry to get contract extension at the end of the season. He is still pretty good for his age and has had a superb last 2 seasons but dont know how he will do next season.


Manchester United could today go ahead of arsenal. Man City also has to be on their toes as they could potentialy lose the 4 point lead they have on arsenal everything is looking exciting in the top of the table with every team a contender for 2-4 places the only team that looks confortable is chelsea they have a pretty nice gap from 1st place to 2nd I am sure they are definitely going to win the premier legue cant see them losing that many points.

Angel fooking Di Maria? Embarrassing display, as was the after match press conference given by Van Gaal. Very happy that Welbeck celebrated, and rightly so, given that Van Gaal has gone on record as saying he isn't good enough for Yanited. Good to Januzaj and Di Maria keeping the tradition of diving alive and kicking. Shameful antics trying to influence the game but luckily the ref didn't fall for it and refused to be intimidated

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Always so gracious in victory PD.

>

> agree that Welbeck had every right to celebrate

> though.


What like Yanited are and have been? We've had the likes of the ginger twat Scholes telling the world via his column in the Standard that Arsenal didn't have a chance in Salford. F**k em.

Scholes is a useless and incredibly bias columnist. Last week's defending of Johny Evans spitting incident with Cisse was unbelievable. Le Arse deserved their win last night and quite frankly I don't blame you for your moment of joy, PD. I did the same when we beat your lot recently. It's only natural.


And if Angel Di Maria is worth 60 million quid I'm a Dutchman.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> frankly I don't blame you for your moment of joy,

> PD. I did the same when we beat your lot recently.

> It's only natural.

>


Personally I think his comments are nasty and shows all that is wrong with many football fans. The way some football fans react towards each other in victory or defeat is pathetic.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a difference between gloating if you want

> to call it that and using poisonous vitriol.

>

> Endless swearing + "ginger twat" etc. There is no

> need for it. Hate is evident all over football,

> its embarrassing.


Celtic V Rangers sectarian nonsense notwithstanding eh? Hypocritical

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Scholes is a useless and incredibly bias

> columnist. Last week's defending of Johny Evans

> spitting incident with Cisse was unbelievable. Le

> Arse deserved their win last night and quite

> frankly I don't blame you for your moment of joy,

> PD. I did the same when we beat your lot recently.

> It's only natural.

>

> And if Angel Di Maria is worth 60 million quid I'm

> a Dutchman.


Cheers Jah

Parkdrive - if you cant you see any problem with your earlier posts then that's fine - I don't understand it but ill move on.


As a general point I don't understand why football has to be so antagonistic all the time. These people are not like this in real life surely - yet they feel they can shout and abuse players etc simply because they have paid for a ticket. Grr.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The answer to that is - don't leave Real Madrid.

> It's a seriously different ball game over here and

> if you're not up to it you'll be found out.



True and once you have been found out - The English premiership (with our sky subscribers money/voluntary tax) will pay massive money for you anyway.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive - if you cant you see any problem with

> your earlier posts then that's fine - I don't

> understand it but ill move on.

>

> As a general point I don't understand why football

> has to be so antagonistic all the time. These

> people are not like this in real life surely - yet

> they feel they can shout and abuse players etc

> simply because they have paid for a ticket. Grr.


Righteous indignation from a supporter of a club that has for generations been guilty of toxic, poisonous, nasty hate filled sectarian chanting? I'm sure you'll understand why I don't give a second thought to your views of my comments.

I'm talking about people not clubs. You and me is fine and I'm happy for you to compare your posts to mine.


Take responsibility for your own posts on here and don't hide behind your club, my club or anyone else's for that matter - as this demonstrates the attitude of many a football fan, that being the point I'm making - its ok because I'm a football fan. You think its ok to post "ginger twat" because you are talking football/banter.


I'd guess you would not post on another thread the way you post on a football thread.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm talking about people not clubs. You and me is

> fine and I'm happy for you to compare your posts

> to mine.

>

> Take responsibility for your own posts on here and

> don't hide behind your club, my club or anyone

> else's for that matter - as this demonstrates the

> attitude of many a football fan, that being the

> point I'm making - its ok because I'm a football

> fan. You think its ok to post "ginger twat"

> because you are talking football/banter.

>

> I'd guess you would not post on another thread the

> way you post on a football thread.


I've taken responsibility for mine. You're talking about people not clubs? So what are those engaged in the toxic, poisonous, hate filled sectarian chants? Not people presumably.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Always so gracious in victory PD.

>

>

>

> I knew I should have added a winkey smiley. I

> never intended to cause a riot,I just just ribbing

> PD.


Otta I've no problem with your comment, just the hypocritical crap from that sensitive chap Mick.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Always so gracious in victory PD.

> >

> >

> >

> > I knew I should have added a winkey smiley. I

> > never intended to cause a riot,I just just

> ribbing

> > PD.

>

> Otta I've no problem with your comment, just the

> hypocritical crap from that sensitive chap Mick.



Why is Mick being Hypocritical- has he spouted hate-filled, spiteful nonsense on here?

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Otta Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Always so gracious in victory PD.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I knew I should have added a winkey smiley. I

> > > never intended to cause a riot,I just just

> > ribbing

> > > PD.

> >

> > Otta I've no problem with your comment, just

> the

> > hypocritical crap from that sensitive chap

> Mick.

>

>

> Why is Mick being Hypocritical- has he spouted

> hate-filled, spiteful nonsense on here?


Oh behave

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Otta Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Otta Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > Always so gracious in victory PD.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I knew I should have added a winkey smiley.

> I

> > > > never intended to cause a riot,I just just

> > > ribbing

> > > > PD.

> > >

> > > Otta I've no problem with your comment, just

> > the

> > > hypocritical crap from that sensitive chap

> > Mick.

> >

> >

> > Why is Mick being Hypocritical- has he spouted

> > hate-filled, spiteful nonsense on here?

>

> Oh behave


Genuine question? Has he, I don't know?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...