Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What Alan said and shouldn't you be rejoicing

> in

> > your victory rather than having a go at your

> > rivals?

>

>

>

> Not like the players are setting an example.

>

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-329504

> 05


I would suggest the media and other who should know better stop being so sanctimonious. Step up Spurs legend Gazza. "I don't understand Spurs fans fuss over Wishere's comments. He loves Arsenal , so is bound to hate Spurs. Spurs fans should be more worried about embarrassed by Arsenal every season". Is what he did as bad as the neo Nazis at CSKA Fulham during their day out in Paris, is it as offensive as the songs sung by certain sections of Liverpool support about the Munich air disaster or certain sections of the Yanited support about Hillsborough? There is a plethora of items for the esteemed members of the press and media to be morally outraged by and they choose this?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe you chose not to read all of my post all

> congratulating you and the Arsenal and Arsene

> Wenger in particular PD? I never mentioned

> Wilshire and I don't have a problem with what he

> did.


I did Jah and this wasn't aimed at you, but at Otta. I find the over the top reaction to Wilshere's bit of nonsense laughable, especially coming from the torygraph, and the fact that despite the lambasting the rag gets on here, someone chooses to use it to highlight a so called issue.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PD, I don't really care a jot about Wiltshire's

> chant, I was merely pointing out that a player

> doing it is only going to encourage others to do

> it.


Encourage them to do what exactly, join in a chant they've been singing for years? A chant that contains the word shit? And that upsets your sensibilities does it?

Oh FFS, no it doesn't upset my sensibilities. Jah said something about enjoying your victory rather than having a poke at your rivals, so I said well the players are having a dig at their rivals. That was it, I didn't criticise him, I didn't make a judgement, I merely pointed out that it had happened.


And you think I'm the sensitive one? Pot and kettle mate.

Kane will definitely stay at Spurs this summer. I think what happens at Real Madrid will decide a lot of the big transfer business this summer, who they buy and then subsequently sell, with Barca's transfer embargo they are top of the food chain at the moment. If De Gea signs for them hopefully we'll get someone decent like Benzema in return...

Barca's transfer embargo has come at a good time for them. It's not like they're short of quality. Are they alloweds to sell?


Benitez said he shouldn't comment too much about Sterling because he's another club's player, which is code for he'll soon be our player. With Rogers staying at the pool, Sterling looks certain to be off. A move somewhere like Real could be good for England (if he can get a game) and frankly I'd rather have a nice transfer fee than a player who doesn't want to play for his club. Just not sure I trust Rogers to spend said fee.

People here told me to let this drop many times, but it turns out that it's become part of FIFAs ability to buy the right end result. It also reflects badly on the FAI.


Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m euros (?3.6m) to stop legal action after France controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup play-off.

FAI chief executive John Delaney said he believed they had a case against Fifa after French striker Thierry Henry's handball in the 2009 match.

Delaney said a "legitimate agreement" was made to drop the claim after Ireland missed the 2010 World Cup.

The FAI first requested that they be allowed to be the 33rd team at that WC, which Blatter made a joke about. Delaney said in his meeting with Blatter that he used some choice swear words to let him know what he thought of him.


I doubt the FAI could have afforded a legal case and how could they seriously consider they might have won it? It's sport after all and shit happens. I'm not sure what the FAI should have done but up until recently Delaney was saying there was a confidential agreement in place with FIFA which he couldn't speak about. Yet now he does.


As the money wasn't going into someone's pocket, as far as we know,what should a poor Football Association have done when it was a case of take it or nothing? I'm not sure but I'd have liked the offer to have been made public at the time it was made and FIFA told to stuff it.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People here told me to let this drop many times,

> but it turns out that it's become part of FIFAs

> ability to buy the right end result. It also

> reflects badly on the FAI.

>

> Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m

> euros (?3.6m) to stop legal action after France

> controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup

> play-off.

> FAI chief executive John Delaney said he believed

> they had a case against Fifa after French striker

> Thierry Henry's handball in the 2009 match.

> Delaney said a "legitimate agreement" was made to

> drop the claim after Ireland missed the 2010 World

> Cup.


Yes you should let it drop. If I remember rightly one of Irelands opponents during the qualify rounds had a stone wall penalty turned down and they, as far as I'm aware, didn't make the same amount of fuss the Irish did. We all know FIFA are toxic to the core, but FAI haven't exactly covered themselves in glory by taking their money. It gives the impression they are more interested in the money than the integrity of the beautiful game.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People here told me to let this drop many times,

> but it turns out that it's become part of FIFAs

> ability to buy the right end result. It also

> reflects badly on the FAI.

>

> Fifa paid the Football Association of Ireland 5m

> euros (?3.6m) to stop legal action after France

> controversially beat Ireland in a World Cup

> play-off.

> FAI chief executive John Delaney said he believed

> they had a case against Fifa after French striker

> Thierry Henry's handball in the 2009 match.

> Delaney said a "legitimate agreement" was made to

> drop the claim after Ireland missed the 2010 World

> Cup.

Just in in case YOU hadn't noticed Declan, Handball incident clearly mentioned, so what are you claiming I've missed? I also make mention of the payment which is the new development, again what am I missing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...