Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So anyway, some newspapers saying Sterling would consider a move to United. There were stories saying United had made contact and Liverpool had immediately said hell no.


I would hate to see Liverpool sell a promising player to United, but Sterling has shown such a lack of loyalty to Liverpool that it's no surprise at all that he'd have no problems moving to United.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So anyway, some newspapers saying Sterling would

> consider a move to United. There were stories

> saying United had made contact and Liverpool had

> immediately said hell no.

>

> I would hate to see Liverpool sell a promising

> player to United, but Sterling has shown such a

> lack of loyalty to Liverpool that it's no surprise

> at all that he'd have no problems moving to

> United.


Yep, or he could end up at Real

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So anyway, some newspapers saying Sterling would

> consider a move to United. There were stories

> saying United had made contact and Liverpool had

> immediately said hell no.


To me this is Sterling's camp trying their best to pee off LFC, and more importantly their fans who will now think he's crossed a line and there's no going back. Heinze tried to do the same and ended up at Real...

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted
The question that needs to be answered is why does Sterling want away from Liverpool? It's the perfect place for him to develop as he is only a kid. If he becomes as good as he appears to have the potential to, he will make more money in a few years than he could spend in several lifetimes. ?100k a week isn't bad to keep you going in the meantime.
Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted
That seems the obvious thing. Everything that makes his career at Liverpool almost untenable has been done. The icing on the cake is the so called possible move to United which I don't believe. If it is all the agents doing then I don't feel sorry for Sterling. He's just plain thick for not getting good advice.
maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The question that needs to be answered is why does

> Sterling want away from Liverpool? It's the

> perfect place for him to develop as he is only a

> kid. If he becomes as good as he appears to have

> the potential to, he will make more money in a few

> years than he could spend in several lifetimes.

> ?100k a week isn't bad to keep you going in the

> meantime.


That's kind of the nature of greed though isn't it doc? Those parasites that live on his wages will do anything they can to up them, including manipulating him into believing that he is worth ?200k a month - and young footballers at his level have a seemingly inexhaustible store of self-belief so I'm sure HE's sure he will continue to improve wherever he plays - and that whoever he plays for will be lucky to have him.


ETa- sorry should have read your second post too, maybe thick is a bit harsh - if I was told what he's being told at that age - and if I also could see it happening to others around me - pretty sure I'd think I deserved a slice of it. Wisdom comes late to all of us.


What he does AFTER the move will be the test.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted
Seriously maxxi, at that age the difference between ?100k and say ?200k a week shouldn't mean a thing. It's a fortune either way. He will get a move away from Liverpool as there's no other option for the club than to sell him IMO. Who wants him will be interesting to see. He ain't that good yet.
aquarius moon

aquarius moon

Posted
Posted

Sherry AM? No, I haven't touched that since I was about 15 and raided my dads drink cabinet!


What I meant was that I'm so used to BBC, the presenters, commentators etc. When the world cup games were being shown on ITV, they weren't as good.


And during half time they spoke about the game, interviewed, kept it so interesting that you were all wound up and excited about the second half.


A bit like Match Of The Day without any adverts!


But it was a good game. Shame about the result though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • richard tudor
      DVLA Licence Renewal

      By richard tudor · Posted

      Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      The Mansion Tax

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
    • Jenijenjen
      The Mansion Tax

      By Jenijenjen · Posted

      The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing.
    • sal 86
      Upland road school street LTN permit

      By sal 86 · Posted

      Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...