Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So anyway, some newspapers saying Sterling would consider a move to United. There were stories saying United had made contact and Liverpool had immediately said hell no.


I would hate to see Liverpool sell a promising player to United, but Sterling has shown such a lack of loyalty to Liverpool that it's no surprise at all that he'd have no problems moving to United.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So anyway, some newspapers saying Sterling would

> consider a move to United. There were stories

> saying United had made contact and Liverpool had

> immediately said hell no.

>

> I would hate to see Liverpool sell a promising

> player to United, but Sterling has shown such a

> lack of loyalty to Liverpool that it's no surprise

> at all that he'd have no problems moving to

> United.


Yep, or he could end up at Real

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So anyway, some newspapers saying Sterling would

> consider a move to United. There were stories

> saying United had made contact and Liverpool had

> immediately said hell no.


To me this is Sterling's camp trying their best to pee off LFC, and more importantly their fans who will now think he's crossed a line and there's no going back. Heinze tried to do the same and ended up at Real...

The question that needs to be answered is why does Sterling want away from Liverpool? It's the perfect place for him to develop as he is only a kid. If he becomes as good as he appears to have the potential to, he will make more money in a few years than he could spend in several lifetimes. ?100k a week isn't bad to keep you going in the meantime.
That seems the obvious thing. Everything that makes his career at Liverpool almost untenable has been done. The icing on the cake is the so called possible move to United which I don't believe. If it is all the agents doing then I don't feel sorry for Sterling. He's just plain thick for not getting good advice.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The question that needs to be answered is why does

> Sterling want away from Liverpool? It's the

> perfect place for him to develop as he is only a

> kid. If he becomes as good as he appears to have

> the potential to, he will make more money in a few

> years than he could spend in several lifetimes.

> ?100k a week isn't bad to keep you going in the

> meantime.


That's kind of the nature of greed though isn't it doc? Those parasites that live on his wages will do anything they can to up them, including manipulating him into believing that he is worth ?200k a month - and young footballers at his level have a seemingly inexhaustible store of self-belief so I'm sure HE's sure he will continue to improve wherever he plays - and that whoever he plays for will be lucky to have him.


ETa- sorry should have read your second post too, maybe thick is a bit harsh - if I was told what he's being told at that age - and if I also could see it happening to others around me - pretty sure I'd think I deserved a slice of it. Wisdom comes late to all of us.


What he does AFTER the move will be the test.

Seriously maxxi, at that age the difference between ?100k and say ?200k a week shouldn't mean a thing. It's a fortune either way. He will get a move away from Liverpool as there's no other option for the club than to sell him IMO. Who wants him will be interesting to see. He ain't that good yet.

Sherry AM? No, I haven't touched that since I was about 15 and raided my dads drink cabinet!


What I meant was that I'm so used to BBC, the presenters, commentators etc. When the world cup games were being shown on ITV, they weren't as good.


And during half time they spoke about the game, interviewed, kept it so interesting that you were all wound up and excited about the second half.


A bit like Match Of The Day without any adverts!


But it was a good game. Shame about the result though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...