Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a score for WH at Liverpool and Palace at

> Chelsea. Great for the league.


With the new TV money an already competitive PL is going to get a lot more competitive. Clubs outside the top 6 don't have to sell a la Everton/Stones...

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > More away wins than home wins again, hope it

> > continues tomorrow.

>

>

> I don't!

>

> I just knew Palace would win today. Intuition.



So you put your mortgage on it presumably?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I understood they were playing a different

> style

> > of football these days.

>

> Standing/stamping on an opponent is same old same

> old for them.



I didn't see or hear about the reasons for the sendings off.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What a score for WH at Liverpool and Palace at

> > Chelsea. Great for the league.

>

> With the new TV money an already competitive PL is

> going to get a lot more competitive. Clubs outside

> the top 6 don't have to sell a la

> Everton/Stones...



I really hope that is the case and the money doesn't go on stupid transfer fees and ridiculous wages.

That's the dog's bollocks.


Been waiting since I as a kid for a win at Anfield - remember a great 1-1 there in mid 70s when Keith Robson scored and Smith equalised and Mervyn Day played a blinder for us to get the draw.


Doesn't matter (to me anyway) that this isn't the Pool of old - we buried 'em.


Home form is down to nerves and the headless chicken panic when they feel the crowd on their backs. But with Nolan finally out of the way I think things will gel.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------


> > With the new TV money an already competitive PL

> is

> > going to get a lot more competitive. Clubs

> outside

> > the top 6 don't have to sell a la

> > Everton/Stones...

>

>

> I really hope that is the case and the money

> doesn't go on stupid transfer fees and ridiculous

> wages.


Article on the subject plus net spend table... http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/saido-berahino-and-john-stones-nondeals-highlights-a-shift-in-premier-league-power-as-spurs-and-chelsea-fail-to-get-their-way-10478337.html

I did think about you today RD. Not for long though!


After our bad start & going one down, I thought I'd be congratulating you at the end & blaming our loss on the absence of Montero. But we didn't need him anyway!


I'm assuming you watched it & will agree that in the 2nd half we turned it around & deserved to win. :)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can't see beyond City now, just a scramble for

> > runners up, 3rd and 4th.

>

> A bit premature to say the least.


Not as far as I'm concerned. Who's going to give them a run for their money? Certainly not Arsenal, United, Liverpool or Chavs.

LVG has spent the best part of half a billion on his "project" with sod all return. Swansea deserved their victory today, Gary Monk showing you don't have to spend shed loads to get decent results. If any other manager had spent the same as LVG with the same end product the press would crucify them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • that is one cliche-ridden post headnun    it doesn’t mean a sack of beans in the real world  “old fashioned voters” meaning the ones dragging the country down this last 15 years just to laugh at the libs tears. Well done all  I’m not looking back at all. This is not a post Europe world in any sense. There are forces bigger than Europe but uk would be better aligning with Europe against, say, china, the pretending we live in some post Europe world.    and in case you hadn’t noticed, whoever you vote for, there are a LOT of ignorant racists feeling very happy with their resurgence - I would fight against them if I were you 
    • No they aren't. You're coming across as a smug, superior liberal, and that's what old fashioned voters (labour, Cons and now Reform) hate. That 'the deplorables' 'they're all ignorant racists' line is what's driving people away from the traditional parties and towards Reform.  You're as guilty of looking back as Labour. This is a new, post-europe world and we all need to come to terms with that, make do with what we have, and move forward.       
    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...