Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a score for WH at Liverpool and Palace at

> Chelsea. Great for the league.


With the new TV money an already competitive PL is going to get a lot more competitive. Clubs outside the top 6 don't have to sell a la Everton/Stones...

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > More away wins than home wins again, hope it

> > continues tomorrow.

>

>

> I don't!

>

> I just knew Palace would win today. Intuition.



So you put your mortgage on it presumably?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I understood they were playing a different

> style

> > of football these days.

>

> Standing/stamping on an opponent is same old same

> old for them.



I didn't see or hear about the reasons for the sendings off.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What a score for WH at Liverpool and Palace at

> > Chelsea. Great for the league.

>

> With the new TV money an already competitive PL is

> going to get a lot more competitive. Clubs outside

> the top 6 don't have to sell a la

> Everton/Stones...



I really hope that is the case and the money doesn't go on stupid transfer fees and ridiculous wages.

That's the dog's bollocks.


Been waiting since I as a kid for a win at Anfield - remember a great 1-1 there in mid 70s when Keith Robson scored and Smith equalised and Mervyn Day played a blinder for us to get the draw.


Doesn't matter (to me anyway) that this isn't the Pool of old - we buried 'em.


Home form is down to nerves and the headless chicken panic when they feel the crowd on their backs. But with Nolan finally out of the way I think things will gel.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------


> > With the new TV money an already competitive PL

> is

> > going to get a lot more competitive. Clubs

> outside

> > the top 6 don't have to sell a la

> > Everton/Stones...

>

>

> I really hope that is the case and the money

> doesn't go on stupid transfer fees and ridiculous

> wages.


Article on the subject plus net spend table... http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/saido-berahino-and-john-stones-nondeals-highlights-a-shift-in-premier-league-power-as-spurs-and-chelsea-fail-to-get-their-way-10478337.html

I did think about you today RD. Not for long though!


After our bad start & going one down, I thought I'd be congratulating you at the end & blaming our loss on the absence of Montero. But we didn't need him anyway!


I'm assuming you watched it & will agree that in the 2nd half we turned it around & deserved to win. :)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can't see beyond City now, just a scramble for

> > runners up, 3rd and 4th.

>

> A bit premature to say the least.


Not as far as I'm concerned. Who's going to give them a run for their money? Certainly not Arsenal, United, Liverpool or Chavs.

LVG has spent the best part of half a billion on his "project" with sod all return. Swansea deserved their victory today, Gary Monk showing you don't have to spend shed loads to get decent results. If any other manager had spent the same as LVG with the same end product the press would crucify them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm fairly sure everyone engaged with this topic will have received this email yesterday, but just in case... "To whom it may concern, We are reaching out to invite you to our upcoming Residents & Stakeholder Drop In Sessions for Gala 2026. We are hosting two drop-in style sessions (one virtual, and one in person) to facilitate more in depth conversations, allowing us to run through our plans for 2026 and to discuss how we are going to address your feedback. We look forward to meeting you in person or online and discussing our event plans for both Gala and On The Rye Festival in more detail. Evening Session (IN PERSON): Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Date: Wednesday 11th February Location: Watson's General Telegraph Lunchtime Session (VIRTUAL MEETING): Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM Date: Friday 13th February We are offering 15 minute slots to speak directly with us in a virtual meeting. Please confirm your availability within this drop in period and we will confirm a time with you. You will then be sent a link directly to join the virtual session. If you would like to attend, please respond with: Your name: Your address: If you will be attending the virtual or in person meeting: Your availability for a meeting time online (if applicable): If you have any access needs so we can accommodate: We really appreciate your feedback and taking the time to attend our engagement meetings. Yours sincerely, Community Team | GALA Festival"
    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...