Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mick he spent a fortune 2 summers in a row. And Clyne and Lallana are decent signings. Loveren has been the real let down, but when he was bought people outside of LFC were saying it looked a good signing. You can't always tell. But he's just too stubborn, he has no plan B during a match. He can change tactics to start a match, but when things weren't working he'd never try something different, he just dogedly stuck to "his way".


To be honest I do think the timing is harsh, but I'd have rather they got rid in the summer.


I will say for him though that last season we were hit hard by injuries, especially that of Sturridge. Had he been fit you never know where we might have finished.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange one, should've happened at the end of last season if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally, I think having artwork of himself at home was a sackable offence.


Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new manager will have to accept that or convince FSG to give them total control...

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> United have looked very average all season to me

> so no surprise Arsenal exposed them


It was a similar first 30mins against Saints, so not sure why LVG is surprised, the team lacks pace apart from Martial, Rooney's and Carrick's legs have gone. It would be nice if LVG for once got off his fat Edam arse and stood in the technical area, telling the players what needs changing instead of waiting until half time....

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite

> some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes

> the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange

> one, should've happened at the end of last season

> if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally,

> I think having artwork of himself at home was a

> sackable offence.

>


I thought Klopp had ruled himself out of a new job over the summer.



> Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so

> transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new

> manager will have to accept that or convince FSG

> to give them total control...



Rogers CLAIMED that he had final say, so whilst he might not have gotten his dream list, he gave the green light for what they did buy.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BFS has never been relegated, but a hard task ahead of him, even harder than trying to please

> Hammers fans...



What rot! BFS left behind a very, VERY happy club. Pleased?! We all waved him off with a tear in the eye.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      How late is your Christmas Card

      By Sue · Posted

      Crikey, £4 plus does seem excessive for one card, let alone twelve at that price! Did he explain why he wanted to spend so much? There could be many reasons. Did the recipients also send expensive cards? If so, rather than putting them in the recycling bin, you could just cut the handwritten bit off and send them to a different relative the following Christmas!
    • bidvid
      Dehumidifier to borrow

      By bidvid · Posted

      Thank you! 
    • Wavin
      Samsung TV remote control

      By Wavin · Posted

      Does anyone have one they no longer need? Thanks 
    • James Barber
      The Mansion Tax

      By James Barber · Posted

      Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, North of East dulwich station is not covered by the Dulwich Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) Suburban requirements.  And 1978 was before this guidance was agreed.  Hi Jenijenjen, We have vacant sites and sites that for certain heights would likely become available. Giibs & Dandy vacant builders yard - neighbours I've spoken to of this site are extremely concerned about what the council may now approve. Kwik Fit, Goose Green Trading Estate instantly come to mind as sites where tall buildings would bring a significant offer to the freeholders to see the sites up. The Southwark Plan treats Giibs & Dandy + Kwik Fit as one site suitable for residential redevelopment. It also lists the Trading Estate for this as well. See page.84 https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf Do you think developers having seen the council approve a 9 storey redevelopment are more or less likely now to seek the same at other East Duwlcih locations?

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...