Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick he spent a fortune 2 summers in a row. And Clyne and Lallana are decent signings. Loveren has been the real let down, but when he was bought people outside of LFC were saying it looked a good signing. You can't always tell. But he's just too stubborn, he has no plan B during a match. He can change tactics to start a match, but when things weren't working he'd never try something different, he just dogedly stuck to "his way".


To be honest I do think the timing is harsh, but I'd have rather they got rid in the summer.


I will say for him though that last season we were hit hard by injuries, especially that of Sturridge. Had he been fit you never know where we might have finished.

Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange one, should've happened at the end of last season if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally, I think having artwork of himself at home was a sackable offence.


Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new manager will have to accept that or convince FSG to give them total control...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> United have looked very average all season to me

> so no surprise Arsenal exposed them


It was a similar first 30mins against Saints, so not sure why LVG is surprised, the team lacks pace apart from Martial, Rooney's and Carrick's legs have gone. It would be nice if LVG for once got off his fat Edam arse and stood in the technical area, telling the players what needs changing instead of waiting until half time....

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite

> some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes

> the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange

> one, should've happened at the end of last season

> if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally,

> I think having artwork of himself at home was a

> sackable offence.

>


I thought Klopp had ruled himself out of a new job over the summer.



> Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so

> transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new

> manager will have to accept that or convince FSG

> to give them total control...



Rogers CLAIMED that he had final say, so whilst he might not have gotten his dream list, he gave the green light for what they did buy.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BFS has never been relegated, but a hard task ahead of him, even harder than trying to please

> Hammers fans...



What rot! BFS left behind a very, VERY happy club. Pleased?! We all waved him off with a tear in the eye.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...