Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick he spent a fortune 2 summers in a row. And Clyne and Lallana are decent signings. Loveren has been the real let down, but when he was bought people outside of LFC were saying it looked a good signing. You can't always tell. But he's just too stubborn, he has no plan B during a match. He can change tactics to start a match, but when things weren't working he'd never try something different, he just dogedly stuck to "his way".


To be honest I do think the timing is harsh, but I'd have rather they got rid in the summer.


I will say for him though that last season we were hit hard by injuries, especially that of Sturridge. Had he been fit you never know where we might have finished.

Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange one, should've happened at the end of last season if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally, I think having artwork of himself at home was a sackable offence.


Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new manager will have to accept that or convince FSG to give them total control...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> United have looked very average all season to me

> so no surprise Arsenal exposed them


It was a similar first 30mins against Saints, so not sure why LVG is surprised, the team lacks pace apart from Martial, Rooney's and Carrick's legs have gone. It would be nice if LVG for once got off his fat Edam arse and stood in the technical area, telling the players what needs changing instead of waiting until half time....

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite

> some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes

> the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange

> one, should've happened at the end of last season

> if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally,

> I think having artwork of himself at home was a

> sackable offence.

>


I thought Klopp had ruled himself out of a new job over the summer.



> Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so

> transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new

> manager will have to accept that or convince FSG

> to give them total control...



Rogers CLAIMED that he had final say, so whilst he might not have gotten his dream list, he gave the green light for what they did buy.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BFS has never been relegated, but a hard task ahead of him, even harder than trying to please

> Hammers fans...



What rot! BFS left behind a very, VERY happy club. Pleased?! We all waved him off with a tear in the eye.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Both notoriously “lovely” people to spend any time with or worse, serve 
    • No, just no.  Zero tolerance does not mean we expect zero crime but that we do not accept a standard level as normal and unavoidable. For those who have suffered such “minor” crimes, myself included having had my house broken into,  it is clear from the lack of action that they are considered “acceptable”’. Once small crimes become known to be ignored, it changes where and how we live.     
    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...