Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick he spent a fortune 2 summers in a row. And Clyne and Lallana are decent signings. Loveren has been the real let down, but when he was bought people outside of LFC were saying it looked a good signing. You can't always tell. But he's just too stubborn, he has no plan B during a match. He can change tactics to start a match, but when things weren't working he'd never try something different, he just dogedly stuck to "his way".


To be honest I do think the timing is harsh, but I'd have rather they got rid in the summer.


I will say for him though that last season we were hit hard by injuries, especially that of Sturridge. Had he been fit you never know where we might have finished.

Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange one, should've happened at the end of last season if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally, I think having artwork of himself at home was a sackable offence.


Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new manager will have to accept that or convince FSG to give them total control...

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> United have looked very average all season to me

> so no surprise Arsenal exposed them


It was a similar first 30mins against Saints, so not sure why LVG is surprised, the team lacks pace apart from Martial, Rooney's and Carrick's legs have gone. It would be nice if LVG for once got off his fat Edam arse and stood in the technical area, telling the players what needs changing instead of waiting until half time....

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Klopp and Ancelotti have been available for quite

> some time, so if one of them gets the job it makes

> the decision to sack Rodgers yesterday a strange

> one, should've happened at the end of last season

> if they had serious doubts bout him. Personally,

> I think having artwork of himself at home was a

> sackable offence.

>


I thought Klopp had ruled himself out of a new job over the summer.



> Ots...LFC have a 'transfer committee', so

> transfers weren't solely down to Rodgers. Any new

> manager will have to accept that or convince FSG

> to give them total control...



Rogers CLAIMED that he had final say, so whilst he might not have gotten his dream list, he gave the green light for what they did buy.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BFS has never been relegated, but a hard task ahead of him, even harder than trying to please

> Hammers fans...



What rot! BFS left behind a very, VERY happy club. Pleased?! We all waved him off with a tear in the eye.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...