Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good luck with that Foxy. I reckon since Moonster

> switched allegiances, she's put a hex on Swansea

> and Millwall are now flourishing...


She wanted to meet up for a Millwall Swansea bash at Wembley for a FA Cup Final.


Well that's not to happen now.


;)

I quite like Paddy Barclay as a journalist and I like this piece reminding Scholes and Ferdinand it wasn't always fantastic when they played for United:


http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/patrick-barclay-ferdinand-and-scholes-should-remember-what-they-achieved-after-failing-in-europe-a3133246.html

I dunno, I think it's easy to cherry pick from history to make a point.

Scholes is right, the current team is average. Despite failing in Europe in those examples Barclay cites, you couldn't say those teams was average. Utd won the CL in 2008, and made the final in '09 and '11, losing only to one of the best ever club sides. The current team is light years away from Barca now. You also have to remember that Fergie's hands were tied in the transfer market at the time, so when we sold Ronaldo for ?80m, we ended up buying Valencia for ?16m because there was ''no value in the market''. LVG has had no such constraints. As well as average, LVG has turned Utd into a joyless, souless team, something you could never level at a Fergie side, win or lose. For me, his constant use of 2 defensive minded holding midfield players, is the crux of the problem. This system which he's used all season tells me he's more concerned with not conceding than scoring goals. Perhaps he doesn't trust the defence. I don't think there's any coincidence that the best spell of football we've played under LVG, was last season when he was forced to play 4-3-3, with only Carrick in the DM position, using Herrera's energy to drive the team forward. For some reason he's culled the club of most of the attack minded players. He's either sold or loaned out at least 8 and only bought in two, Depay and Martial, both very young and inexperienced at this level. You only had to look at the Utd bench for the Wolfsberg game to see the paucity of attack minded players we have at the club. To me it's careless and a dereliction of duty to have let so many players go and not replace them. If he continues in a similar vein until the end of the season then I expect he will go then. He's got time and a transfer window to address these issues, but I'm not holding my breath, he's not known as the Iron Tulip for nothing...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't believe Gus Poyet is one of the favs for

> the Swansea job.

> Great performance by Arsenal and Giroud last

> night...


Me neither!! I thought Giroud and Campbell had great games, and Ramsey is far better playing centrally than out wide. Probably be out next round but hey ho.

Yeah, credit where it's due. Excellent stuff from Le Arse last night. Having Ramsey back must be a massive lift for the team. Excellent hat-trick from Giroud and you'd hope that would put all those silly Walcott fantasies about being a centre forward back in the box where they belong.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would have had chicarito at Arsenal in a

> heartbeat. Not sure what he did to piss United

> off.


I missed this and totally agree. Saw him at Upton park, maybe 4 years ago? Almost impossible for a defender to mark.

Manchester Evening News reporting that Ryan Giggs would be open to leaving Utd for Swansea job.

From a Utd perspective it makes sense to me for several reasons...


He can't be enjoying how LVG sets up Utd. His lack of comments speaks volumes.

With his close ties to Neville and Scholes through Salford, their criticism of LVG must be awkward for him.

Lining him up as Utd's next manager is a massive risk without any managerial experience...

Excellent performance from Spurs tonight and a Lamela hat-trick. We're now at long last starting to see what a player he can be for us. His work rate as with all the young lads who came in tonight was phenomenal. It goes to show if you really put in the effort and work hard the breaks will come. And he speaks the lingo too. Woo!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, credit where it's due. Excellent stuff from

> Le Arse last night. Having Ramsey back must be a

> massive lift for the team. Excellent hat-trick

> from Giroud and you'd hope that would put all

> those silly Walcott fantasies about being a centre

> forward back in the box where they belong.


Walcott will never be a centre forward, striker yes but never a centre forward

Some interesting stats I learned today. Bournemouth players run more than any other team in the league. When they beat Chelsea, Chelsea ran more than they had ever done according to John Terry.


Injuries are the result of a previous injury and secondly due to a change in training regime for new players. That second one you would think clubs would work out. Every player is different and their needs are different. It would appear with all the money in the game that some clubs haven't worked that out.


Man United's goalscorer today was taken off because...........please complete the sentence.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Man United's goalscorer today was taken off

> because........... of LVG's inability to see that perhaps he just might have been their main threat up front. Sad to say but probably true. That how awful that have become.


And forget about the stats. Tottenham round around a lot too and I'm sure our fitness had helped but its goal that win matches.

> Man United's goalscorer today was taken off

> because..........LVG saw a 2-1 defeat as an improvement on the last time we played and lost at Bournemouth in 1984, that day we didn't score a goal. Tick tock Louis, tick tock...


and/or...


> Man United's goalscorer today was taken off

> because..........it would distract from the news that Chicarito scored a hat trick and Wilson netted again. Tick tock Louis, tick tock...



I could do this all day :)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Typical Tottenham! Just when you think we're doing

> alright we go and screw things up. It's the hope

> that kills you.


Fergie always said that young players were inconsistent.

They also haven't learnt game management, how to play out a game from a winning position.

Arsenal on the other appear to be doing just that, another slick, professional performance...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...