Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does Manchester have a same city rivalry after

> all

> > only one of the two is actually in Manchester?

> > Just saying

>

> Manchester United

> Sir Matt Busby Way

> Old Trafford

> Manchester

> M16 0RA

>

> Trafford is a borough of Manchester, just as

> Islington is a borough of London. Just saying...


And Woolwich...that's a borough too :)

This time last season Leicester were bottom of the table and about to commence their great run of wins that helped them avoid relegation.

I wonder what odds then of them being premier league champions in 2016 ?

If they were an athlete or cyclist with that kind of improvement they would likely be accused of being drugs cheats.

I'm sure they're not, as team sports don't work that way, but I wonder what elements have all come together st once in such a short period of time to achieve these kind of gains?

I think most football pundits are useless, with a few exceptions, but I can't blame any of them for not picking Leicester or Spurs as their tips for the title at the start of the season. Who could possibly have predicted that?

I don't think the slump of the usual title challengers could have been predicted either. Let's see if pundits will think twice before trotting out their usual lazy tips next season. I'm not so sure the other 'big' teams will be back next season. All may have new managers and could be in a state of flux for a season or two so an unlikely candidate for title may emerge again.

Leicester aside, what I'm incredulous about this season is the (mostly) nouveau Arsenal fans and "celebrities" like Piers Moron and their sense of entitlement, complaining about Arsene Wenger, saying he should go. I find it unbelievable after all the stability and success he's brought them down the years. Just because they haven't won the Premiership for over a decade. Try being a Spurs fan or a Leicester fan, come to think of it.


Obviously, I'm not including our own Parkdrive or Lady Gooner in this assessment but I'd be interested to hear what they think about it.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I said West Ham would struggle. Well, they will

> struggle to get into the top four with their

> upcoming fixtures.

> Joking aside, it's hard to predict who will finish

> top 4 now, let alone back in August, but I hope

> West Ham do if it's at the expense of Arse or

> City...


Don't worry I had Leicester going down!


I think (this season) we are as good as anyone to be honest, away wins at City, Liverpool, Everton, Arsenal (and should have been Man U support that) - If we'd had Payet fit all season who knows where we'd been.... I think we have a chance of top 4, but I think it's a small one.

Piers Morgan has been on Wenger's back for a few years now. He's gone quiet in last couple because Arsenal have won the cup. Wenger's a class act and should be treated with more respect by these plonkers. In some ways the Leicester story strengthens his own stance on transfer policy and overspending on players. He has always been uncomfortable splashing too much cash if it didn't represent good value. And he is right to think that. It hasn't helped City or United this season. Leicester have built a potentially Premier league winning squad on a shoestring. The current wisdom seems to be that he should go if they don't win the league, but I think that would be folly. All the big clubs will likely have new managers so if anything Arsenal should stick with him and his Premier league experience.

earlydoors Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He has always been

> uncomfortable splashing too much cash if it didn't

> represent good value. And he is right to think

> that. It hasn't helped City or United this season.


It's helped them in previous seasons though. I don't think you can use this season and Leicester's success as any kind of benchmark, unless they sustain it over a longer period. To go from certs for relegation to champions elect in one calendar year is totally freakish. Leicester haven't really built a team to win the PL either, a lot of the squad were in the Championship...

No but both represented reasonably good value when you compare to someone like Eric Lamela who cost ?30 million or even Di Maria at ?57 million. When Wenger did splash the cash he did it astutely.

I agree about Leicester's success being freakish, though I think they may have won the championship by a record total of points with essentially the same team.

Though perhaps not the template for success in EPL it resoundingly proves that it's not just about money. Forest did the same thing all those years ago to even greater success and in relative terms they were still paupers compared to Liverpool and Man Utd at the time.

Having said that I think they may have bought the first million pound player in Trevor Francis, but only after the success they achieved on a shoestring enabled them to do that.

Actually, Lamela is finally coming good and he's still only 23 and learning his trade so plenty of scope for him to get better and at ?26.5 million he could still prove to be very good value for money.


Francis was indeed the first million pound player and what Clough did at Forest is still unmatchable. If I wasn't a Spurs fan I'd be cheering Leicester on to win the league.

I don't think it's a good idea to have a coach who is also on the board of a club. The manager should be accountable to the board, not part of it. It creates a grey area on accountability. It's not working, his rewards are too great, his recent achievements too small and he needs independent scrutiny by a competitive board of directors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A Google search brought up eleven Chango  branches, although they don't all seem to be listed on their website. In the order they came up: East Dulwich, Clapham Common, Mayfair, Wandsworth, City of London, Wimbledon,  Parsons Green, Kensington, Highgate, Richmond, Hampstead. I think it is the positioning of this new branch that has mostly got to me. I accept that they would have to go for where a space became vacant, but Lordship Lane is pretty long, even just the part with shops in,  and choosing to  open a stone's throw away from Chacarero seems mean, to say the least. I wonder if they have made contact with Chacarero. It would be nice to think they had (in a friendly way, obviously!) As regards the apparently  marketing spiel, at least one of the online reviewers also refers to a Chango branch (the Parsons Green one in this case) as a "gem". Probably just coincidence and a word in common use to describe such places. I wouldn't know. I'm ancient 🤣
    • I like empanadas. I don't think Chango is a massive chain - it's got a few stores all in London I believe (stand to be corrected if I've got that wrong). I don't see a problem with them opening on the Lane personally. I really like Chacarero, but that doesn't mean that they should be immune from competition - if they're successful and open a couple more stores, are we then meant to stop supporting them for being a 'chain'?  That opening post does sound a lot like marketing spiel though. Is the OP perhaps connected to the new business I wonder?
    • According to what I can see online, Dynamic Vines and Cave de Bruno sell totally different kinds of wine to each other.  Dynamic Vines  "work with independent winemakers who produce outstanding wine using sustainable practices in the vineyard and minimal intervention in the cellar".  Cave de Bruno specialises in French wines and spirits from small independent producers. So two different USPs, and no doubt two different but overlapping customer bases who can afford these wines. Probably different again to the people mainly  shopping for wine at Majestic or the Co op. On the other hand, the two empanada shops appear on the face of it to be selling virtually identical products. But time will tell, won't it? Let's see how they are both doing in - say - a couple of years' time. Impossible, of course, to compare that with how they would have done if there had been only one of them. I just feel more  sorry for the original one than for  the one which can apparently already afford to have a number of shops in places like Mayfair and Highgate. I'm tempted to buy something there every week, and I don't even like that kind of pastry 🤣
    • Not only can he turn olive oil into Vermouth, but also water into a wine. A true miracle worker.  I wouldn't say a wine shop sells a wide variety of things - and there are two right next to each other.  And once upon a time, upmarket pizza shops were very specific. So were burritos etc. These Argentinian cornish pasties are clearly becoming mainstream; we should consider ourselves lucky to be witnessing this exciting upward trend within our lifetimes and on OUR HIGH STREET. We can tell our grandkids that we remember when there was no internet and no empanadas.  I'm sure that if the family empanada people have a good business head, they'll be able to ride this wave of competition, just like Bruno has. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...