Jump to content

Football Focus

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Liking Paddy Power on the Celtic result:

>

> "it was a tough game in tough conditions" ..it was

> a game against a team of shopkeepers in a holiday

> resort

>

> Anyone seen Mick M BTW?



Oooh. Powder dry but now in the CL proper.


Oooh. And a star on the shirt too. Have a look at yours.

titch juicy

titch juicy

Posted
Posted

I've just realised that Man City will go into pot 2 of the CL draw and Spurs into pot 3. In spite of Spurs finishing 3rd and City finishing 4th.


Apparently co-efficients based on the last 5 years of European competiton determine this.


How is this even approaching fair? Surely it's just designed to keep the established European teams in the competitions at the expense of newer teams trying to break in.


Grossly unfair.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

If you are a habitual domestic league winner (eg Barca) and that habitual winner happens to drop a place in their domestic league it doesn't stop you being a pot 1 team.


We wouldn't want Barcelona to be a pot two team - what chance would the pot 3 and pot 4 teams have with a pot 1 team (eg Bayern or Real Madrid) + Barca in the group?


That's why its done over a longer period and considered fair - its fair to the other teams in the group.

titch juicy

titch juicy

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you are a habitual domestic league winner (eg

> Barca) and that habitual winner happens to drop a

> place in their domestic league it doesn't stop you

> being a pot 1 team.

>

> We wouldn't want Barcelona to be a pot two team -

> what chance would the pot 3 and pot 4 teams have

> with a pot 1 team (eg Bayern or Real Madrid) +

> Barca in the group?

>

> That's why its done over a longer period and

> considered fair - its fair to the other teams in

> the group.


Of course we'd want Barca to drop down to pot 2 if they dropped in form in the league. That would suggest they weren't as good as the previous year and should be seeded accordingly. Conversely if they weren't as good as previous years, they shouldn't be good enough for pot 1 and out of their depth.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Of course we'd want Barca to drop down to pot 2 if

> they dropped in form in the league. That would

> suggest they weren't as good as the previous year

> and should be seeded accordingly. Conversely if

> they weren't as good as previous years, they

> shouldn't be good enough for pot 1 and out of

> their depth.


and if you believe that you'll believe anything.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

I get yours - I'm not sure you get mine - which is UEFA's thinking. They are trying to ensure the group chances are fair for all four teams in each group, not some more heavily weighted than others and they believe that more than just last years performances is the best way to achieve it.


I agree with them - its a bit like, form is temporary class is permanent.

titch juicy

titch juicy

Posted
Posted

Do you really believe that's their thinking? And it's not in place to protect the bigger teams? They couldn't give a shit about the smaller teams.


Football is all about form and teams should be seeded or judged on form.


In this format teams are being given a leg-up just because they've done well in the past.


It's like saying that Man City and Chelsea should only have to play lower positioned teams in the premier league for the first 6 weeks of the season because they've won the league some time in the past 5 seasons.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

I know what you are saying - Its easier to understand if you think outside England. England has a bit more turnover than Spain Germany etc. Noone wants Barca or Bayern to be in Pot 2.


And the evidence that they do give a shit about the smaller teams in Platini's decision a few years ago to have (in the qualifying rounds and play offs) a champions route whereby champions of smaller countries (Israel / Scotland / Poland / Ireland) play each other rather than playing a fourth place team from the big leagues - eg Man City.


Without that I doubt Celtic would be in the group stages - neither would Legia Warsaw. It would eventually be big league teams only if it had been allowed to continue.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Rangers drew last night.


Barton yet to make his mark


Barton was ineffective again, his main involvement being on the end of the terrible tackle that earned Killie teenager Taylor a red card just after the hour.


The Englishman was anonymous. Wasteful in possession, passive as a defensive midfielder and a non-event going forward. Eventually he was replaced by Niko Kranjcar. He walked to the bench, shaking his head as he went.

Otta

Otta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Don't know what to make of that. Barton, despite being a muppet, has got quality. But he's no spring chicken. But everyone is allowed a bad day, perhaps it was just that.



Either way, I'm not sure I've ever seen someone take so much interest in their rivals as you MM.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't know what to make of that. Barton, despite

> being a muppet, has got quality. But he's no

> spring chicken. But everyone is allowed a bad day,

> perhaps it was just that.

>

>

> Either way, I'm not sure I've ever seen someone

> take so much interest in their rivals as you MM.


The next Celtic game is the first Old Firm SPL game for 4 years Otta.


Since Barton signed he's been shouting the odds about Celtic on Twitter week on week along with slating Scott Brown so everyone is looking forward to them facing each other on 10 Sep.


What however Barton might not have been expecting was to be handed his balls on a plate each week by midfielders of mediocre opposition, which is how it's gone for him so far.


The green side of Glasgow finds it all quite amusing. However I'm genuinely interested is how he looks next time out. He was a marquee signing for Rangers, so there you go.

SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Since Barton signed he's been shouting the odds

> about Celtic on Twitter week on week along with

> slating Scott Brown so everyone is looking forward

> to them facing each other on 10 Sep.

>

> What however Barton might not have been expecting

> was to be handed his balls on a plate each week by

> midfielders of mediocre opposition, which is how

> it's gone for him so far.

>


Shouting the odds? Think he made one comment about how he thought he was better than Brown.

One comment about how he'd not meet your manager out and about in Glasgow as he doubts they'd frequent the same establishments (that was actually a radio interview not Twitter) and then one comment about how lucky Celtic were to make the Champions League?

Can you argue against any of those points?

  • 2 weeks later...
Peckhamgatecrasher

Peckhamgatecrasher

Posted
Posted

Good article. Why does the word corruption float to the top of my mind?


There is no doubt, more housing is needed, but why not let it grow organically out of the Millwall community hub? You just know that the new neighbours will be of the cock crowing-, church bell ringing-complaining variety.


Is that too cynical for a Saturday morning?

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted
Just as well PGC. I enjoyed the Manchester derby if not the result. City were very good especially in the first half. Not sure what to say about United. Great goal by Zlat and we should have had a pen. Maybe time for Rashford to start games. I'm not sure what Smalling has done wrong. I like Blind but maybe not as a centre half. Great season in store I think meaning generally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Leaves on East Dulwich streets

      By Sue · Posted

      The original post was made by someone else, not the person whose post I was replying to! And the original post only mentioned Whateley Road (which has been clear of leaves whenever I have walked down it) and another unspecified road.
    • Sue
      BYO restaurants

      By Sue · Posted

      We had a delivery from Matoom last week. Sadly, as I had high expectations, especially as it wasn't cheap, I was underwhelmed. To start off with  positives, the corn cake starter was ok, and my partner said his green curry and coconut rice was tasty. I  (unadventurous I know but I wanted to do a direct comparison with Chern Thai) had Pad Thai (with tofu and veg). There was a lot of it, which was good. So much that I had half of it cold for breakfast the next morning. However, it was almost completely noodles, with hardly any veg or tofu. In fact there was so little tofu I don't actually remember eating any.  I do remember thinking that the stirred in egg must be some kind of tofu. I'm wondering now whether they were busy and forgot the tofu altogether! As it didn't come with peanuts (which I knew in advance as they weren't mentioned on the menu) I ordered a peanut sauce (?) separately, though I can no longer see this on the online menu. This didn't really help much taste wise  For comparison, we both had Pad Thai for lunch yesterday (Saturday) at Chern Thai, with gyoza to start. The Pad Thai was fantastic, good sized portions with lots of tofu and several different kinds of  really fresh lightly cooked vegetables.  The gyoza were also excellent, just the right amount of crispiness and with a good amount of dipping sauce. The meal  was also very well priced. I realise it's not very fair to directly compare the price of delivered dishes to dishes from  an eat-in lunch menu, but in terms of overall value it was much better. And the service was lovely. In case our Matoom delivery  was a one off glitch, we will book a table and eat in there, but so far I am disappointed. ETA: Just realised this thread is about BYO. Chern Thai used to be solely BYO, but it now has a full drinks menu with Thai beer on draught and  wine. You can still BYO, but there is a charge. We had jasmine tea, which was very nice.
    • Tori Griffiths
      GALA 2026

      By Tori Griffiths · Posted

      Hi Angelina - whilst I’m not close enough to this decision (as a candidate not a councillor), I would hope there will be public consultation if this situation arises again next year. As a local resident, I will push for this, if I do become a councillor. Hello - I will ask for this to be updated as soon as possible, as I appreciate people will be looking for this info!
    • Sue
      Suitcase Repairs

      By Sue · Posted

      You could try Merrifields, the shoe maker on the left from  Goose Green roundabout going towards  the station? He is very helpful,  and if memory serves can also repair things like belts and bags, so worth asking (maybe phone first).

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...