Jump to content

Recommended Posts

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with AC and 3. On the spot fine for

> putting something that is not even amusing on such

> a blog spot


So everyone has the SAME sense of humour and it's like yours? Is that what you mean? If not how can you write that?

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like it. More please. On the spot fines for

>

> Crocs

> Eating fried chicken on the bus

> Saying "awesome"

>

> I could go on but I'm getting over-excited.


Though Giggi - Crocs eating fried chicken on the bus {while} saying "awesome" - that'd be gnarly.

Fine bit of debate on this thread.


I'd bring back hanging for everyone. I wrote to the Sun.

The took my advice - they brought it back

National costume was all-over-black

There were corpses in the avenues and cul-de-sacs

Piled up neatly in six-man stacks

Hanging from the traffic lights and specially made racks

They'd hang you for incontinence and fiddling your tax

Failure to hang yourself justified the axe

A deedely dee, a deedely dum

Looks like they brought back hangin' for everyone

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sad times, and these crimes are only going to increase whilst next to nothing is done.
    • I don't understand this thread. If police were involved to chase the cyclist, why does the OP say "thank God the cyclist got away"? Police don't chase random cyclists who have done nothing wrong! I had originally assumed that the original chasing car was a police car, as the OP talks about "seriously erratic and dangerous driving by the police", but it seems not? Unmarked police cars put on blue lights when they need to make themselves known. There have been quite a few around in this area lately. Surely a police car would have put on those lights before giving chase?
    • I have taken to not using my phone on pavements in London period.. feel very vulnerable around ED anyhow as am alot slower with walking these days. When  you-think about it, surely we can all last until get to cafe, hospital, train station, shop, etc without this overwhelming need to see/check phone! Bus times are usually accurate when you tip up and never long to wait for buses anyhow. I use my phone alot during the day for various reasons but, trying to not use it  is the real test. I have found that you can always ask someone who, generally happy to accommodate. Lanyard that Sue has suggested - good idea but still phone is visible in this heat I would have thought, assuming she wars it round her neck so personally, think it is worse as bikers, gangs etc can just rip it off as they pass.
    • In my experience working with police, esp Roads Policing, they don't drive erratically and dangerously. Most of them will be TPAC trained, or done advanced driving at the very least. Police in car chases live in fear of injuring or killing a member of the public, it genuinely is one of their worst nightmares. So I feel safe assuming that whatever the kid on a bike had done, the pursuit and tactics were justified.  I don't understand "Thank God the cyclist got away before 2 police vans arrived to help". Are you saying you're glad that a wanted, probably dangerous, criminal escaped a co-ordinated, tactical pursuit, involving three police units? That's weird, especially given how much people complain about crime round here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...