Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Safety is a major concern as some people have the need to take 2 buses.

For e.g the route 12 from West End to Dulwich Plough, then you may have to change to a 197 or 185 for the rest of your journey.

Or from Kings Cross the 63 takes you to Honor Oak and you may have to change to get the 363 to Crystal Palace.

The debit allowance allows you one bus ride, you end up stranded at night at Honor Oak, the oyster shop closes early evening and you have no way of getting home? Frightening prospect for a woman or for the vulnerable....the thread "followed on FHR" springs to mind.

When non London based family members visit- they usually pay cash for one or sometimes two bus journeys as it is not worth them getting a pass etc. We keep 2 spare oyster cards for grandchildren visiting ( 2 are over 15) but hubby usually meets them at the train station so takes Oyster cards with him.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I heard that oyster will be replaced by

> bankcards/smartphone app or

> a bankcard tech type of oyster for those with no

> bankcard

> or smartphone by the end of this year


JohnL I don't doubt you, did your source know what the reason behind it was?

You get the money back you deposit for an Oyster card when you turn it in. Therefore, your family members needn't be out of pocket for the cost of the Oyster.


I can't see them getting rid of Oysters altogether for smart phones. Not enough people have smartphones or debit cards-- despite what it might seem like living in ED, neither things are universal. That would lead to certain segments of society actually not being able to use transport, which would never make sense as policy for TFL. They might introduce the ability to do both in parallel but they won't prevent people without bank accounts or smartphones from being able to travel in London.




Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When non London based family members visit- they

> usually pay cash for one or sometimes two bus

> journeys as it is not worth them getting a pass

> etc. We keep 2 spare oyster cards for

> grandchildren visiting ( 2 are over 15) but hubby

> usually meets them at the train station so takes

> Oyster cards with him.

Cash is a useful emergency way of accessing buses. It makes buses more reliable for the user. I've helped pay for someone's cash bus journey late at night when their Oyster card didnt work rather than see them turned away.


When my kids are a little older I'd expect them to idenepentaly travel by bus, but kids regularly lose things, having that emergency cash backup to access buses is reassuring. Not having it and I'd be tempted to drive and collect them for my own peace of mind.


But most imporatnly do repsond to thep ublic consultaton. While it's nice to share views here they wont influence the final decision by TfL.

I think it will be a disaster if this happens. Worst case scenario is that you're out and you loose your Oyster or you run out of money on it. Cash is a back up but it would make people vulnerable if they couldn't use it as a last resort.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cash is just another thing for the driver to worry

> about. It's 2013, let's move on.

>

> What does this have to do with East Dulwich

> though?



I think it's because there are TfL bus services in East Dulwich and there are people who use them.

Laur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Safety is a major concern as some people have the

> need to take 2 buses.

> For e.g the route 12 from West End to Dulwich

> Plough, then you may have to change to a 197 or

> 185 for the rest of your journey.

> Or from Kings Cross the 63 takes you to Honor Oak

> and you may have to change to get the 363 to

> Crystal Palace.


In my view, that's a separate argument. You don't have to pay to interchange across Tube lines so why do you have to with buses? In other cities, your bus pass is 'open' for 60-120 minutes (varies by city) and you can swap buses as often as you like within that period. Why we can't do the same with Oyster (given that it's already intelligent enough to auto-cap and work out the auto-top ups) is a mystery?


To be really radical, why not allow the bus fare to be deducted from a Tube journey immediately afterwards? So you pay your ?1.40 on the bus but then only 0.70 rather than another ?2.10 for the Tube. You can switch from DLR to Underground without paying two fares, why not from bus to Tube?


The main argument for keeping cash seems to be that we like it as an emergency back up but kids can lose cash just as easily as an Oyster card. Cash payment can be reliant on someone on the bus being able to help with change - sure we've all seen someone trying to pay with ?10 or ?20 - or being community minded enough to pay the extra fare.


Over the next few years, more and more phones will be fitted with the chips that allow payments - and not just latest smartphones. Or you'll be able to buy phone cases that incorporate a similar chip to use as a back up if you forget or lose your card.


Yes, there's the still the argument that if you are mugged you may no longer have your phone or your Oyster, but you may also have no cash at that point too.

Money more likely to be stolen than Oyster.


Why are people getting so bothered about this, to me it's ridiculous.


My job is travel training SEN Kids in East London. As a result I'm on buses all the time with kids, and you're always seeing kids telling the bus drivers they've lost their passes, and the vast majority of the time (as long as the kid hasn't tried to sneak on) the drivers let them travel.


I can't remember ever seeing a kid pay cash for a journey.

I don't travel to work by public transport or use buses on a daily basis, so I'm not in a position where I need to top up my Oyster card that frequently. It is very rare that I travel by train or the underground, so don't can't top up my card on line and update it at a station. Most of my bus journeys tend to be for hospital and other medical-related appointments, and I generally catch a bus from the stop almost outside my house. If I haven't realised that my balance has fallen below the minimum amount until I get on the bus, I am perfectly happy to pay for a single fare in cash, rather than get off the bus, walk to the nearest newsagent, and then be late for my appointment. I have yet to be on a bus that is delayed in any way by someone who is paying a fare in cash; the only delays I have seen are caused by people trying to get enormous pushchairs onto crowded buses without folding them down.


I think it would be a great shame if cash payments are banned on buses and have responded to the consultation.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it will be a disaster if this happens.

> Worst case scenario is that you're out and you

> loose your Oyster or you run out of money on it.

> Cash is a back up but it would make people

> vulnerable if they couldn't use it as a last

> resort.



Totally agree.


Otta, my daughter lost her child Oyster card last week and we have now called to have it replaced, so she won't have it for another week (that's how long it takes to process child Oyster cards).


I have had to travel with her a number of times whilst she hasn't got her Oyster card and have paid cash for her. If that option had not been available, I would have had to leave her at home or walk.


There will always be times when people need to be able to use cash to pay for journeys.

She lost it at home and we were looking for it for a week. It still takes a week to process a new one. Doesn't make sense to buy another Oyster for that period. That is just wasteful.


Mine is just one example of reasons why cash payments should not be done away with. I am sure there are plenty more.


I've punctured my bike tyre more than once and had to remove the wheel, leave my bike chained up and come home on the bus. I didn't have an Oyster card because I cycled everywhere, so paid cash to get home and to go back to get my bike once the puncture had been fixed.

Also the point about kids losing change as easily as Oyster cards is rubbish. Most kids keep change in their trouser pockets and it makes a noise when it drops on the floor. Oyster cards are so much easier to lose. They usually keep Oysters in their blazer or cost pockets and you are unlikely to hear an Oyster card drop out.


Plus people can help a stranded kid (or adult) by paying their fare in cash.


Just because you have no fear of being stranded somewhere without being able to get home, doesn't mean this isn't a very real fear for lots of other people.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...