Jump to content

Transport issues between London Bridge/central London and East Dulwich


Recommended Posts

On 22/02/2025 at 01:55, Dulwich dweller said:

The 78 from London Bridge to Peckham Rye is a much quicker route than going via the Elephant and Camberwell.

I  just looked this up.

The 78 doesn't seem to stop anywhere very near  London Bridge? Is my geography all wrong?

It's also quite a long walk from Nigel Road to ED, depending on where in ED you live!

I have no idea why whoever put this route online seems to think that the stations are at the Nigel Road bus stop and not the Peckham Rye Station bus stop 🤣

Does nobody at TfL (or whoever does these) not actually check them before they put them into the public domain?! 

Screenshot_20250225-091041.thumb.png.7b9363e06375dd5d3f074eed5c0b47c4.pngScreenshot_20250225-091051.thumb.png.5b63f07972a397006d1459180998227f.png

Edited by Sue
2 hours ago, Sue said:

I have no idea why whoever put this route online seems to think that the stations are at the Nigel Road bus stop and not the Peckham Rye Station bus stop 🤣

Possibly a legacy from when no buses went down Rye Lane, Nigel road would have been a the closest.

There may be an argument that the diversion of 40 assumes an easy change to other buses, which isnt the case going southbound.  How long are the building works at elephant going on for?  The stop has been moved twice. One for GLA rather than Southwark

  • Like 1
On 23/02/2025 at 21:40, Sue said:

What route does that take?

From London Bridge you'd have to walk a short distance along Tooley Street to the junction of Tower Bridge Street and get on it there. The 78 comes from Liverpool Street over Tower Bridge then down to Peckham via the back of Bermondsey and the Old Kent Road. Kind of a roundabout route but worth knowing as a back up.

The TfL Journey Planner is a useful site as that will often find alternatives if one mode of transport (or one particular stop / line etc) is out of action: https://tfl.gov.uk/plan-a-journey/

The trick is not to be too prescriptive with it. Use general areas rather than exact postcodes otherwise it'll be too focussed on getting you to an exact point - if you just specify "Dulwich" it will look at options to North, East and West Dulwich stations, bus routes that go through Dulwich in general rather than "this stop in particular".

Hope that helps.

  • Thanks 2
9 hours ago, exdulwicher said:

From London Bridge you'd have to walk a short distance along Tooley Street to the junction of Tower Bridge Street and get on it there. The 78 comes from Liverpool Street over Tower Bridge then down to Peckham via the back of Bermondsey and the Old Kent Road. Kind of a roundabout route but worth knowing as a back up.

The TfL Journey Planner is a useful site as that will often find alternatives if one mode of transport (or one particular stop / line etc) is out of action: https://tfl.gov.uk/plan-a-journey/

The trick is not to be too prescriptive with it. Use general areas rather than exact postcodes otherwise it'll be too focussed on getting you to an exact point - if you just specify "Dulwich" it will look at options to North, East and West Dulwich stations, bus routes that go through Dulwich in general rather than "this stop in particular".

Hope that helps.

Thanks.

I have used the 78 on occasion, but not to get to and from London Bridge. It does indeed take quite a roundabout route.

I usually use Google maps set to public transport, but I will try the TfL site as well if stuck, to see if that comes up with different options.

There's a lot of talk about long bus journeys.  Generally buses are used for short journeys, as there will usually be a faster mode of public transport.  When I occasionally got the 185 into Pimlico for work very few of the passengers did more than two or three miles.  Whilst it is annoying if you have to change I understand why routes eg 159   Streatham to West Hampstead, were cut in two.

Hopefully we all know why the 159 was so famous.

22 hours ago, Sue said:

e 78 doesn't seem to stop anywhere very near  London Bridge? Is my geography all wrong?

It's also quite a long walk from Nigel Road to ED, depending on where in ED you live

Fair enough. I got it mixed up with 47. 78 passes Tooley Street at the other en It doesn't take long to get to Peckham because it literally cuts through Peckham. I understand why you go via the elephant albeit a tad longer to do so. I had the 484 in mind to carry on your journey from Peckham Rye but only if you're based near East Dulwich rail station.

20 hours ago, OutOfFocus said:

Possibly a legacy from when no buses went down Rye Lane, Nigel road would have been a the closest.

 

I looked at TFL's website - lots of ways of contacting them but none  I couldn't see away of contacting about issues on website (in this case duff data). Anyone able to suggest the "least wrong place".

1 hour ago, Dulwich dweller said:

Fair enough. I got it mixed up with 47. 78 passes Tooley Street at the other en It doesn't take long to get to Peckham because it literally cuts through Peckham. I understand why you go via the elephant albeit a tad longer to do so. I had the 484 in mind to carry on your journey from Peckham Rye but only if you're based near East Dulwich rail station.

Forgive me if I have misunderstood you, but the 47 doesn't seem to be much help as a step in the journey to get to East Dulwich from London Bridge?

Also, the 484 doesn't just stop at ED station? It also stops at Goose Green and Oakhurst Grove (the Oakhurst Grove stop is near the bottom end of Crystal Palace Road).

If memory serves,  the  12 and the 197 also go from Peckham Rye to East Dulwich?

6 hours ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

The change to the number 40 (i.e. no longer going to London bridge) was a long time ago - I think more than 5 years ago?

Wikipedia takes you to https://www.mylondon.news/news/zone-1-news/tfl-bus-routes-scrapped-16134311 2019 (BC - Before COVID)

  • Thanks 1
On 26/02/2025 at 09:46, Sue said:
On 26/02/2025 at 07:54, Dulwich dweller said:

from Peckham Rye but only if you're based near East Dulwich rail station.

Forgive me if I have misunderstood you, but the 47 doesn't seem to be much help as a step in the journey to get to East Dulwich from London Bridge

Yes you've misunderstood. I didn't suggest you use the 47.

 

On 26/02/2025 at 09:46, Sue said:

 

Also, the 484 doesn't just stop at ED station? It also stops at Goose Green and Oakhurst Grove (the Oakhurst Grove stop is near the bottom end of Crystal Palace Road).

I'm aware of that. It has to get to ED station some how

10 hours ago, Dulwich dweller said:

 

I'm aware of that. It has to get to ED station some how

I think we are talking at cross purposes?

You said "I had the 484 in mind to carry on your journey from Peckham Rye, but only if you are based near East Dulwich Station."

 I'm really confused now! How does East Dulwich Station come into it, then? 

Which direction of travel are you talking about?

Edited by Sue
On 03/03/2025 at 14:54, Sue said:

I think we are talking at cross purposes?

You said "I had the 484 in mind to carry on your journey from Peckham Rye, but only if you are based near East Dulwich Station."

 I'm really confused now! How does East Dulwich Station come into it, then? 

Which direction of travel are you talking about?

Meaning it's not much use if you're based up Lordship Lane direction and not on its route in Dulwich. The station being almost the last bit Dulwich that it serves. 

The direction of travel I had in mind was from Nunhead Lane where the 78 stops near the 484 stop on the Rye and heads. towards East Dulwich Station.  

 

On 08/03/2025 at 04:04, Dulwich dweller said:

Meaning it's not much use if you're based up Lordship Lane direction and not on its route in Dulwich. The station being almost the last bit Dulwich that it serves. 

The direction of travel I had in mind was from Nunhead Lane where the 78 stops near the 484 stop on the Rye and heads. towards East Dulwich Station.  

 

I'm still quite confused, but never mind!

I suppose it depends on exactly where you live and how far you are willing to walk!

If you are getting the 484 in that direction (ie heading towards Camberwell Green)  you can get off at Oakhurst Grove and walk up Crystal Palace Road.

Or you can get off at Goose Green and walk up Lordship Lane (or get another bus) or walk round the back of the EDT and then up Crawthew Grove.

It  all seems like quite a complicated way to get back, but then with the loss of that part of  the 40 route, any way is now, if the trains aren't running as scheduled.

Or you can get a 12 from Peckham up Barry Road.

Edited by Sue
  • 1 month later...

Just seen this thread.

 

The 40 was changed as part of an exercise to reduce excess capacity in Central London. This meant some routes were changed, or lost.

 

The 40 might have been withdrawn entirely if it wasn’t for the fact that it was actually much busier at peak times between Dulwich and Denmark Hill than it was in the Central London area. So it remained and the 35 got a frequency increase to match the demand from the Camberwell and Walworth corridor to the London Bridge corridor. Other routes serving Central London were more heavily cut back, such as the 45, 100 and 388, the 40 was chosen to service the Blackfriars corridor. It was also considered there was an accessible rail link between East Dulwich and London Bridge and the 40 provided access to the 35 and 343. 

 

The 176 did run to Oxford Circus but truthfully it was not always great. By the mid 2000s the buses would get stuck in that section and it wasn’t out of the ordinary for it to take a bus 60+ minutes to get from Tottenham Court Road to Oxford Circus and back, way less than walking pace. Oxford Street was absolutely ram packed with buses. The cutback to Tottenham Court Road was meant to be temporary, but it was made permanent.

 

Not all doom and gloom - last year the 176 got a frequency increase in the evenings and Sunday shopping hours, because it was easily proven that it was extremely well utilised with longer distance trips between Central London and Dulwich.

Edited by The Urbanite
  • Thanks 2
18 minutes ago, malumbu said:

Pedestrianising Oxford Street is long overdue.  I recall the fuss made when this was done in Trafalgar Square but now we'd never go back to how it was 

Whilst I agree, it's a very long walk from one end of Oxford Street to the other, and getting a bus is much less hassle than the underground.

On 26/04/2025 at 23:25, Cancerian said:

All part of Sadiq Khan’s crazy plan to change Oxford Street! 

It was originally due to the excavation works related to the construction of the Elizabeth Line. This resulted in various buildings being demolished, like the London Astoria. It also resulted in the left turn from Charing Cross Road into Oxford Street being lost. The 176 was the only route that did that move. The options were either to divert it, incurring the cost of one or two extra vehicles to sit in the West End traffic, or cut it back to Tottenham Court Road.

 

The works went on for a few years but when the time came, yes, there was a push to thin out the sanguine-esque ribbon of buses pootling along Oxford Street and the temporary cutback became permanent. The law of diminishing returns applied where the volume of buses along there made the journey so slow, it was quicker to walk. Now there are far fewer routes on Oxford Street, the buses can actually progress at a reasonable speed and it takes a fraction of the time it used to to get a bus from one end of Oxford Street to the other!

Edited by The Urbanite
On 27/04/2025 at 09:44, malumbu said:

Pedestrianising Oxford Street is long overdue.  I recall the fuss made when this was done in Trafalgar Square but now we'd never go back to how it was 

A fuss made?  You’ve probably only been a cyclist for a few years and if longer then good luck to you. I’ve  been driving since 1981 and it’s the best thing ever. Why should cyclists be prioritised over car drivers?  The West End would be destroyed. 

Not sure if you're arguing that the pedestrianisation of the north side of Trafalgar square was a bad thing, but I can't imagine many people would want to reverse it. So much better now.

Most provincial high streets went down the pedestrianisation route 40 years ago or more. Crazy that the UKs 'premier shopping street' is effectively a car park. Of course large parts of it should be pedestrianised and landscaped to turn it back in to a destination, rather than the messy street in decline that it is now.

Soho should also be pedestrianised.

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...