Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am very saddened if any foundation in the rumour that this lovely shop will be taken over shortly by another big chain coffee shop. What a shame this is another nail in the coffin to the independent local businesses in Lordship Lane, turning the street in to just another bland UK high street given over to corporates. What a pity the LL landlords are so greedy that their rents preclude the eclectic businesses that originally gave ED its own identity the chance to thrive and prosper and keep ED original and special.
Is it possible to find out who some of these landlords are who are pushing up rents on Lordship Lane and North Cross Road? We hear a lot about how greedy they are and how they couldn't care less about the character and make-up of East Dulwich. Is there a list, and is it in the public domain?

The landlords in this case ar elocal and have been working really hard to find a good tenant for Lordship Lane.

I hope this unit isnt proposed to become a non retail use. That owuld require a change of use and depart from the plans for the area.

Not wishing to be harsh but if a shop fails on what is a prominent thoroughfare, surely it means it was either a bad idea, in the wrong place anyway or badly run? Would it not be better to have anything successful (albeit preferably something unique and interesting) than something that fails?
To be fair James the shop that was there hardly failed, it had been there for almost ten years, but the rent increases were mainly instrumental in its demise. Also note several businesses have closed along the lane over last few months, ie Black Cherry, Draft House, Green and Blue, Lush Designs, Old Villa (due to go), Grace & Favour (well established), Soup dragon etc etc. the pattern is the rents are out of control and the independent businesses just cannot compete with chains. E Dulwich is rapidly losing its individuality

Agreed @IanSE22. But it?s not just the rents. Business rates are a killer and are based on the rental value of the premises, so in East Dulwich they just keep going up as well. Miss one payment instalment or part of, with Southwark Council and it is straight to the Magistrates Court, extra costs and a potential visit from the bailiffs. Just to play music in a shop can cost up to ?2,000 a year in licence royalty fees.


Banks are now very reluctant to allow landlords to lease shops to independents unless they have an established history of trading. They view them as too high risk to enable the landlords to pay their interest commitments. In the short term in East Dulwich I am sure that shops will be rented out when they become available, however I am not so sure about the long term look of the high St.

eddie: I think the figure you quote for playing music in a shop is bit misleading. According to their tariff (here) the PRS licence for a shop up to 100 square meters - say the old chemist on the corner of LL and Matham Grove - is ?151 a year. Shops larger than 6,000 square meters (are there many on Lordship Lane?) can pay "up to ?2,000 a year" but only if they've been caught without a licence. The PPL licence (for record companies/performers) is at a similar level ("your music licence could cost ?122.64 a year").

BJL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> eddie: I think the figure you quote for playing

> music in a shop is bit misleading. According to

> their tariff (here) the PRS licence for a shop up

> to 100 square meters - say the old chemist on the

> corner of LL and Matham Grove - is ?151 a year.

> Shops larger than 6,000 square meters (are there

> many on Lordship Lane?) can pay "up to ?2,000 a

> year" but only if they've been caught without a

> licence. The PPL licence (for record

> companies/performers) is at a similar level ("your

> music licence could cost ?122.64 a year").



PPL keep billing me ?1800. They joys of having high ceilings!:)

Hi IanSE22, how do you know it is going to be a coffee shop? Were you that chap that worked there?


IanSE22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am very saddened if any foundation in the rumour

> that this lovely shop will be taken over shortly

> by another big chain coffee shop. What a shame

> this is another nail in the coffin to the

> independent local businesses in Lordship Lane,

> turning the street in to just another bland UK

> high street given over to corporates. What a pity

> the LL landlords are so greedy that their rents

> preclude the eclectic businesses that originally

> gave ED its own identity the chance to thrive and

> prosper and keep ED original and special.

Call me Ishmael, call me what you like, but if a shop opens up that you don't like, don't darken their welcome mat.


I've never stood in a Starbucks, originally I just never got round to it, but after a couple/three years I started punting it as a matter of principle.

Except when closely cross-examined on the matter I couldn't come up with six good reasons as to why I refused to patronise the shops.

So I resorted to waving my blackthorn stick about and loudly proclaiming how much 'agin' it I was.

That put paid to them logicians and their so-called thought and reasoning.


I went to the Nero upstairs in Morleys once, but that was only because my companion was both in charge and beguiling.


Not been in one since.

Angusvanfrehley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moo Too.....the rent was esentially doubled, this

> impacted on the business rates


Don't think so:


http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/valuation/2010/12121484000/10383804000


Could be wrong.


John K

To be fair I am not an expert on businesses rates.... I have it on very good authority the rent doubled..... a friend enquired and was told ?36k a year. With insurance, pay for public radio use, accountant fees, wages, security, utilities and purchase of stock your looking at a lot of loot to make it work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello.  A parcel for someone at 64B Blenheim Grove has been dumped at my address.  If anyone from 64B is in this forum, please get in touch!
    • CPR Dave is anti-dogs. Each to their own  I think my dog has perhaps grown a bit less nervy about the fireworks in the last few weeks, interestingly. Our last dog had no problems with them until he reached old age, when he became petrified.  CPR Dave - it's not just sounds of the metropolis they hate, mine collapses in fear when he hears thunder too 
    • There's quite a difference between going for a run around the footpaths and trying to sit quietly for an afternoon in a wide, grassy area and enjoying the peace & nature. The other two grassy areas in the park are used for sports, and both had barriered trackway running through them. The Parkrun had to be cancelled for at least three weeks, iirc. I'm concerned by your continued reference to "the rye" - the event is held in the park, not on the rye (common). There is a big difference, despite the organisers and council artificially amalgamating the whole area when trying to convince everyone that it's only a small area that is closed off. The railings & gates enclosing the park are a big clue...
    • So have you cancelled your contract with InPost / Yodel now? If so, that's probably caused hundreds of parcels to be stuck in limbo, as they've said to me before that they can't redirect them to a different store. I have a parcel that was refused by you twice, the last time on 5/12, and since then there's been no updates, despite me calling them 3 times. They just say it's being investigated, but if they now can't physically deliver to you then that is obviously the issue. So much for shopping for Christmas presents early, looks like I'll never get them now.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...