Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The four artists' proposals for the new art work will be on display at a special exhibition open to the public.

Date: 14, 15 and 21, 22 September

Time: From 11am to 5pm

Location: Francis Peek Centre, Dulwich Park, College Road, SE21 7BQ


The artists are: Ryan Gander, Anya Gallaccio, Conrad Shawcross and Eva Rothschild.


At the exhibition you will be able to view models, watch film and read artists' statements about the proposed works. You will then be able to comment on them.


If you can't attend the exhibition itself then you can view the four shortlisted artists' proposals online and then share your views by completing an online form: http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200438/dulwich_park_art_commission


I work for Ryan Gander and you can find out more about his project here: astageforanything.com

Thanks for that, I wouldn't have known about this otherwise.


ETA: Anyone else reminded of David Inshaw by the final picture on the Southwark webpage?


Just looked it up - it's this one!


http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.globalartprints.co.uk/images/David-Inshaw-Cricket-Game-I.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.globalartprints.co.uk/David-Inshaw-Cricket-Game-I-Art-Print&h=293&w=432&sz=20&tbnid=oZuW_SzV8tfoZM:&tbnh=78&tbnw=115&zoom=1&usg=__CY0oju-F7wf4N0_tYFHSM52a0Gk=&docid=z5SeKcfr-ZhuzM&sa=X&ei=Sug2UsCyNfTb7Abqu4GQBA&ved=0CKwBEP4dMBA


Oh and this is the Southwark page with pictures of the proposals on:


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200438/dulwich_park_art_commission/3119/shortlisted_artists


Edited again to say, before anybody makes any comments about get a life etc, I'm laid up in bed ill :))

Thanks for the links, Barnie Page. I think the Ryan Gander idea would be a great enhancement to the park. I like the concrete sequoia stump too, but the fact that the Gander "piece" refers to the Hepworth sculpture - the reason why it's there in the first place - makes that stand out for me. And like Jeremy points out, it'll be great to have a theatre space/something else for children to run around on too.
Is there a reason why the Hepworth couldn't have been recast? I went along on Sunday and "voted" for Ryan Gardner's piece almost by default as it was the least underwhelming of a very poor pool. I'm surprised that a tie-in of some sort with Camberwell Art College wasn't considered. The park could have had its very own fourth plinth, with students submitting designs to occupy it for a year at a time.

That 'fourth plinth' idea is getting a bit tired now and would seem like a cop-out I think.


For me the tree stump idea has a wonderful 'Alice in Wonderland' feel to it. And the stage area is highly imaginative too. These are my favourites.

The bird's eye view is almost secondary to the function of the space, the fact that from above it looks like the Hepworth is more a part of the process than being an overriding concept.

Most importantly it provides an interesting space that can be enjoyed in a similar way to the Hepworth. During the research for this project Ryan read threads on this very forum where people shared photos and memories of their enjoyment of the Hepworth, and it is hoped that this space would be enjoyed in similar ways.

Fourth plinth has been done before, no point recreating it. But if a platform for happenings is what you want then the Stage For Anything provides just that, as well as a budget for local performing arts groups to put on a yearly performance.

Hawley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is there a reason why the Hepworth couldn't have

> been recast?


I understand there was a stipulation with her estate / Barbara Hepworth Foundation that there should be no posthumous casts of her work.

I loved the Hepworth and part of me likes the concept of having it landscaped but where in the park would it be? I'm curious as to how they might use the stage as a result - is it in the American Garden as the stump would be? I'm also a little concerned about how easy it might be to maintain. They cut the grass in the park with large mowers - would they be able to keep this in trim or will it end up looking a bit miskempt.


I like the concrete stump because it is a fabulous contrast to all the actual trees in Dulwich Park and because the park keepers do a great job of digging up all the real stumps!


The only thing that appeals about the cast iron work is that having a series of them might be fun - and presumably one could potentially go where the Hepworth once was.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...