Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Enter Ms B in pink tights and fairy costume, balancing lightly on the back of the first of four cantering liberty horses and smiling at the crowd, who applaud wildly. How they gasp as she somersaults backwards and lands on the rump of the second horse as the band clashes cymbals, then to the third, then a double somersault to the fourth, where she opens her arms to the crowd again as they clap and shout for more.


(Not even convincing myself here but my inner child will thank me for it and none of you knows me anyway.)

The Flying Honaloochies group together, hands held.


Then HonaloochieB+ takes his place on the see-saw. HonaloochieB squares his manly shoulders, and Honaloochieb and Honaloochiebeta assist HonaloochieBeJaysus to a standing position atop the aforementioned manly shoulders.

He braces himself and takes a leap toward the raised end of the see-saw.

With immaculate timing HonaloochieB+ steps off the see-saw just before HonaloochieBeJaysus arrives at the other end.

The crack of breaking bone is audible around the arena. HonaloochieB+ is doubled up with mirth. HonaloochieBeJasus is is screaming with pain.

Clowns come on with a stretcher to take a way the injured acrobat. He leaves the ring bellowing threats and empracations at his nephew.

At one of the ring side seats a little girl is heard to ask "Mummy, what's a c*nt's trick?"


(More to follow)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What Firkins were they? The only localish ones I remember were the Phoenix and Firkin and the Fox and Firkin. The Plough has changed its name several times, and then back to the Plough, but to the best of my recollection the Uplands Tavern was named that until it became The Actress, and The Bishop was called something else whose name escapes me (though the smell from the gents lingers in my memory) but I'm pretty sure it wasn't a Firkin?
    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...