Jump to content

whats happened to the Bishop?


jam_log

Recommended Posts

ElmGrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I have a house in SE15 and on the title deeds it

> says it is in East Dulwich.


That's not surprising if your house was built in East Dulwich.


The northern boundary of East Dulwich Parish was along the centre of Choumert Road.


What is interesting is if in any sense East Dulwich was ever considered to run further north.


Surrey County Records office has a catalogue entry for a 17th century indenture for land that is described as in "that part of Peckham Rye that is in East Dulwich".


The original Peckham Rye was roughly between where Choumert Road and Highshore Road are now.


Some indentures have a plan or map to deliniate the land. I would like to see this one.


As an aside it would be interesting to know whether Highshore Road was so-named because it was remembered that this was where the high-water mark of the River Thames was.


John K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ElmGrove Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > I have a house in SE15 and on the title deeds

> it

> > says it is in East Dulwich.

>

> That's not surprising if your house was built in

> East Dulwich.

>

> The northern boundary of East Dulwich Parish was

> along the centre of Choumert Road.

>

> What is interesting is if in any sense East

> Dulwich was ever considered to run further north.

>

> Surrey County Records office has a catalogue entry

> for a 17th century indenture for land that is

> described as in "that part of Peckham Rye that is

> in East Dulwich".

>

> The original Peckham Rye was roughly between where

> Choumert Road and Highshore Road are now.

>

> Some indentures have a plan or map to deliniate

> the land. I would like to see this one.

>

> As an aside it would be interesting to know

> whether Highshore Road was so-named because it was

> remembered that this was where the high-water mark

> of the River Thames was.

>

> John K


How is this genuinely helpful or useful in the discussion of whether certain pubs are good or bad? The mind boggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • We were trying to contact Steve on 07990904375, following this post and yet there wasn't any reply from this number. Is it a correct number to contact Steve for decoration work?  
    • You might be 'amused' but obviously its something thats enough of a concern that there are specific rules in the entrance criteria to specifically disallow this, so not exactly comparative.  Aside from the flawed analysis, the idea of so much movement that there is a massive cost to the taxpayer of finding extra schooling is also unlikely.  As I noted upthread, the cost of private school education has increased dramatically in recent years.  Increases in fees over 10% per annum in some cases, so the idea that the application of VAT would drive the majority out just isn't the case.  There will be some who can't afford it any more. But then there are lots of people who couldn't afford it in the first place. Anyone who has accepted a school place in the last 2-3 years will have known this was Labour's policy, so their kids will be in year 9 by the time Labour gets in.  That would mean that only parents of those with children in years 10/11 likely to have been unaware when signing up.  They can obviously move their children for sixth form if needed.  The others shouldn't be surprised!  Those with children in juniors will need to take a view whether affordable or move to the state sector. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...