Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Laurahw, No I thought it would be of interest to some people,

as bodsier says above.Regardless whether you may think I have "an axe to grind"

This is something beingg reported in the news based on facts not speculation,

making it irrelevant who the OP is,

Hi smiler, its a u-turn over the connection with glaxo, smith and klines swine flu vaccine with narcolepsy. If

you google the title of this thread adding narcolepsy, then telegraph, although lots of reporting of it. Sorry

i'd do a summary myself but probably best to read it yourself.

Totally agree that it's good to have all the information and make informed choices. So long as the information is accurate, up to date and unbiased. (on that basis I wish I hadn't bothered clicking on the second link)


To summarise the telegraph piece - 4 families claimed for compensation because they believed their child developed narcolepsy because of the swine flu jab. Their claim was turned down initially but new evidence suggests that the condition could have been caused by the jab so the government have contacted them about this (that's the u-turn). There could be about 100 other similar cases and it could cost a lot in compensation although there is an argument over if the condition is severe enough to fall under the government scheme.


So basically, all routine vaccinations carry a very small chance of side effects. The government didn't think narcolepsy was one of those side effects but it altered it's opinion when presented with good evidence.

The adjjuvant (a substance that enhances the bodys immune response to an antigen),

In the swine flu vaccine was Os03=oil based squalene, these vaccines are banned in US.

Hence the second link above.


CDC centers for disease control is currently sponsoring an an international study

on the association between adjuvanted monvalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine and

narcolepsy.The study is expected to be completed in 2014.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't want to name a shop, but I have twice at this busy time of year had an issue, and yesterday was overcharged when buying a number of small things. If you are using a shop which doesn't give an itemised receipt, or doesn't give a receipt at all, just be aware that it might be a good idea to check that you are not paying over the odds (and if using cash, that you are given the right change for what you handed over). When staff are busy they might make mistakes.
    • As I had a moan on here about the truly abysmal Christmas meal we had at The Cherry Tree last year, I am redressing the balance by saying we had a really excellent Christmas meal at Franklins last night. Every course was absolutely delicious and  really well cooked. The staff were lovely despite being exhausted and run off their feet. In particular, my sea bass was a large portion and cooked to perfection, in stark contrast to the small dried up portion The Cherry Tree provided, from which I was barely able to scrape a teaspoonful of flesh (that is not an exaggeration). And our Franklins meal cost less than half what we paid at The Cherry Tree (to be fair, that was on Christmas Day so the Cherry Tree costs would have been higher, but that doesn't excuse the appalling quality meal). Thank you again to Franklins for restoring our faith in eating out at Christmas! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...