Jump to content

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, malumbu said:

This thead smacks of "I hate Labour"

Which is a perfectly legitimate political position to take and somewhat parallels the (equally legitimate) 'I hate Tories' or  'I love Labour' positions taken by other posters. Or indeed 'I hate car drivers and owners' or 'I love cyclists' positions frequently paraded. 

  • Agree 2
13 hours ago, malumbu said:

This thead smacks of "I hate Labour", similarly recent posts on the Khan thread, for some of you.  

Shock horror 

Objecting to a policy does not dub them Haters of your precious party.

Although I now seeing you as Sméagol, "My Precous, i's wants my precious party"

gollum-lord-of-the-rings_a21qa26UmZqaraWkpJRmbmdlrWZlbWU-2235319255.thumb.jpg.1ae759397b72d2635d7fdb3205bb20ec.jpg

28 minutes ago, DuncanW said:

You okay mate?

 

I'm fine thank you, and you ? 

Just fed up of people throwing out "you hate xyz" in a discussion because they present an alternative view. 

Its called a discussion forum for a reason, not a one sided monologue platform. 

 

Although now I said it, Mal will forever sound like Sméagol when I read what they post 🤣

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
48 minutes ago, HeadNun said:

God forbid we should have a discussion that doesn't align with the forum doctrines. 

That Piermont Green house is a gem. A great example of art deco at its finest. I love that period of architecture and design. 

Art deco or Arts and Crafts?

It's definitely not Art Deco style, regardless of when it was built otherwise all houses built in the 1920s could be described as Art Deco.  The estate agent's blurb desribes it as being built about 1914 in the style of Lutyens whose work has been described as being in the Arts and Crafts style with a heavy Tudor influence.

  • Thanks 1
1 hour ago, Jenijenjen said:

It's definitely not Art Deco style, regardless of when it was built otherwise all houses built in the 1920s could be described as Art Deco.  The estate agent's blurb desribes it as being built about 1914 in the style of Lutyens whose work has been described as being in the Arts and Crafts style with a heavy Tudor influence.

Yes, you're right. I was conflating Art Deco with 1920s and it does have more Arts and Crafts features. Either way, I think it's a pretty house. 

  • Agree 1

We purchased our 4 bed semi in ED in 1975  it had been reduced by £500 for quick sale and was  £16,500!,

Original owner lived on first floor but let out rooms downstairs. We had to do considerable redecoration and some alterations to adapt it to 3 elderly relatives with mobility issues, plus myself, partner and toddler.  I was joint owner with my elderly aunt and after her death, we had to get a small mortgage to pay out some of her bequests.

My neighbour's house was on the market for £1.4 million but his place was far better condition than mine.

I agree that many folk are asset rich but cash poor .

5 hours ago, Insuflo said:

It’s probably best described as Tudorbethan. It displays a rather twee, rose tinted yearning for a lost England that never really existed. Much like many posters on this forum. 

For me, it's not about a twee, rose tinted, yearning for a lost England that never really existed. From an aesthete's point of view, I just prefer the architecture and craftsmanship of yonder years, as well as glass, ceramics, furniture and decoratives. So much now is bland, cookie-cutter and soul-less. 

It's very sad how, on this forum these days, you can't even comment on liking an old house, without it being somehow sneered upon. 

  • Agree 1

There's an indicative map here of whi falls foul. Sevreal dozen in SE 22ml.

I dont think this is up to date though. And by the time the government have done their "independent" valuations I think we can expect a lot more to fall into this tax trap.

 

https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/11/27/mansion-tax-map-where-the-money-comes-from/

2 hours ago, HeadNun said:

For me, it's not about a twee, rose tinted, yearning for a lost England that never really existed. From an aesthete's point of view, I just prefer the architecture and craftsmanship of yonder years, as well as glass, ceramics, furniture and decoratives. So much now is bland, cookie-cutter and soul-less. 

It's very sad how, on this forum these days, you can't even comment on liking an old house, without it being somehow sneered upon. 

What worries me is all the talk of these foreign architectural styles.  Art Deco (French) and Art  Noveau (Belgium - can you even name ten famous poeple from Belgium),   Thank heavens for good old British Arts and Crafts, harking back to previous times.

 

6 hours ago, Pugwash said:

We purchased our 4 bed semi in ED in 1975  it had been reduced by £500 for quick sale and was  £16,500!,

Original owner lived on first floor but let out rooms downstairs. We had to do considerable redecoration and some alterations to adapt it to 3 elderly relatives with mobility issues, plus myself, partner and toddler.  I was joint owner with my elderly aunt and after her death, we had to get a small mortgage to pay out some of her bequests.

My neighbour's house was on the market for £1.4 million but his place was far better condition than mine.

I agree that many folk are asset rich but cash poor .

What do you think those who are asset poor and cash poor may think?  Don't you feel there is a case for evening things out?

10 hours ago, HeadNun said:

God forbid we should have a discussion that doesn't align with the forum doctrines. 

That Piermont Green house is a gem. A great example of art deco at its finest. I love that period of architecture and design. 

Get real.  There are numerous anti-Labour threads and a few of you who clearly hate everything Labour, no doubt going back decades.  Not everyone of course who have posted on this weird thread has such strong views.  

For balance there are a lesser number of threads on other political parties and a former prime minister, but they attract far less traffic, and one person seems to go out of their way to defend Farage

On 26/11/2025 at 21:30, Cyclemonkey said:

Won't someone think of the poor people burdened with a £2M house "through no fault of their own" .....  seriously?

This is literally unearned money mainly gained through govenrment policies that has given home ownership preferential treatment for decades but you think it is fairer to rise income tax?  Young graduates are already effectively paying a higher marginal rate of income tax due to student loan repayments and can barely afford to rent in London,   but it is fairer not to touch the unearned housing wealth of boomers?  

It isn’t unearned money, because it isn’t money at all. It’s a theoretical value. Do you think the government will take an iou for when a house is sold and (and if) the money becomes real?

@bonaome yes that is what is being proposed for the asset rich and cash poor.

Also an mortgage free asset worth £2m is very much real money -  you can remortgage, release equity, use it as security for a loan, downsize, out it to work earning money (Airbnb, lodgers etc..) etc.. etc.. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...