Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The English Heritage approach to preservation of buildings now emphasises "sense of place" and townscape. This can be read about in copies of Conservation News which can be downloaded for free from the web-site.


Since spring 1964 East Dulwich has lost many non-domestic buildings that made up our townscape.


It is time to consider those few that are are still with us.


The English Heritage application process is straightforward.


Here is a worthy candidate.


John K

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An excellent candidate.

>

> I'm with John here :)


I agree entirely. I think the tiles are distinctive and unusual, and the whole seems to embody a spirit of futile optimism which, because it's been cruelly dashed by the inevitable bludgeon of time, exemplifies, in a very concrete sense, the essence of the human condition. We all start out embodying other people's hopes and, for a while, may even be cherished, but we all go to our graves ugly and alone. The building's brutal celebration of that simple truth, albeit metaphorically, is surely worth preserving. I am, however, glad that such senior members of the forum have chosen to champion it first, as otherwise it might have seemed tactless.

rgctobin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> John K - would you care to elaborate on the

> supposed architectural merit of your "worthy

> candidate"?

>

> RT


The starting point for context is the three comparators:


The old Woolworths building

The old Co-Operative building

The present Co-Operative building


All post World War II.


All with the same design purpose of having economically viable ground-floor retail unit(s).


Burbage has identified one of the key features likely to be of interest to English Heritage.


John K

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Burbage has identified one of the key features

> likely to be of interest to English Heritage.

>



xxxxxx


His prose style certainly has that je ne sais quoi .......

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The building needs to be considered in the round,

> including its rear.


As, sadly, do we all. But, as your picture makes clear, the west face is something of a revelation. At first glance, there's an almost Escherian playfulness in its gutterless geometry, and an apparent acknowledgement of human liberty in the graceful levity of the aerial walkways. On closer consideration, however, the sinisterly labyrinthine qualities become clear. This is surely a Castle rather than a Castalia, a sarcastic Berghof of the flatlands. It's no coincidence that the stairway leads not to heaven but to a parody of a Clarkeian monolith, a decidedly earthly destination that demonstrates both the limits of human ambition and the fearful mundanity of life's purpose.


I disagree that a building's occupants are irrelevant. We might think of the building chiefly as a garish bunker of frozen comestibles, but it also houses suburban exiles of the rat-race, a plight that's been reflected both presciently and appropriately by the architect. One of the key deliverables of any civilisation is the accommodation of the unfortunate and this has surely earned its place in the townscape on that ground alone.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> The building needs to be considered in the round,

> including its rear.

>


xxxxxx


I think it has a lovely rear.


Why is Father Ted's "Lovely Girls Competition" springing to mind?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I dont get complaining if nothing is broken? If you dont like the parcel service just buy your products elsewhere which ship with a different company. simple fix🤷‍♀️
    • It happened again tonight. This time a group of kids ( I hate saying that, because it makes them sound less intimidating than they are), threatened to throw a water bomb at me. When I dared them, they started lobbing them. Then they started saying they were going to kill my dog and one of them jumped over the fence of the Japanese Garden and took a running kick at my dog, who got out of the way. He jumped back over the fence, then came back, came within a meter of me and threw a water bomb really hard at me.  I can't be sure it was exactly the same crowd as last time, though I suspect the male ring leader could be.  The police came and were amazing - as was the park warden - and are fairly confident of the identity of one of them and think they may have tried to arrest him before.  There were maybe as many as 15 of them, aged 16-18, all Caucasian, girls and boys (girls being just as aggressive as the boys). The ring leader is a slight man, dark hair / eyes, possibly with facial hair about 5'6", petite, wearing an all-blue tracksuit.  So please be careful when you're in the park around 6.30 / 7pm. The local SNT have been informed. 
    • Hello, I have lots of jam jars and also bigger jars. Happy to swap for some plums. I'm home tomorrow afternoon or Friday during the day. I'm at 24 Blossom Court , Sumner Rd  SE15 6FU , tel 07958533429
    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...