Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The English Heritage approach to preservation of buildings now emphasises "sense of place" and townscape. This can be read about in copies of Conservation News which can be downloaded for free from the web-site.


Since spring 1964 East Dulwich has lost many non-domestic buildings that made up our townscape.


It is time to consider those few that are are still with us.


The English Heritage application process is straightforward.


Here is a worthy candidate.


John K

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An excellent candidate.

>

> I'm with John here :)


I agree entirely. I think the tiles are distinctive and unusual, and the whole seems to embody a spirit of futile optimism which, because it's been cruelly dashed by the inevitable bludgeon of time, exemplifies, in a very concrete sense, the essence of the human condition. We all start out embodying other people's hopes and, for a while, may even be cherished, but we all go to our graves ugly and alone. The building's brutal celebration of that simple truth, albeit metaphorically, is surely worth preserving. I am, however, glad that such senior members of the forum have chosen to champion it first, as otherwise it might have seemed tactless.

rgctobin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> John K - would you care to elaborate on the

> supposed architectural merit of your "worthy

> candidate"?

>

> RT


The starting point for context is the three comparators:


The old Woolworths building

The old Co-Operative building

The present Co-Operative building


All post World War II.


All with the same design purpose of having economically viable ground-floor retail unit(s).


Burbage has identified one of the key features likely to be of interest to English Heritage.


John K

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Burbage has identified one of the key features

> likely to be of interest to English Heritage.

>



xxxxxx


His prose style certainly has that je ne sais quoi .......

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The building needs to be considered in the round,

> including its rear.


As, sadly, do we all. But, as your picture makes clear, the west face is something of a revelation. At first glance, there's an almost Escherian playfulness in its gutterless geometry, and an apparent acknowledgement of human liberty in the graceful levity of the aerial walkways. On closer consideration, however, the sinisterly labyrinthine qualities become clear. This is surely a Castle rather than a Castalia, a sarcastic Berghof of the flatlands. It's no coincidence that the stairway leads not to heaven but to a parody of a Clarkeian monolith, a decidedly earthly destination that demonstrates both the limits of human ambition and the fearful mundanity of life's purpose.


I disagree that a building's occupants are irrelevant. We might think of the building chiefly as a garish bunker of frozen comestibles, but it also houses suburban exiles of the rat-race, a plight that's been reflected both presciently and appropriately by the architect. One of the key deliverables of any civilisation is the accommodation of the unfortunate and this has surely earned its place in the townscape on that ground alone.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> The building needs to be considered in the round,

> including its rear.

>


xxxxxx


I think it has a lovely rear.


Why is Father Ted's "Lovely Girls Competition" springing to mind?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Completely unacceptable. They need to fund a proper, permanent park warden presence or this sort of behaviour will get worse. Parks should be safe for all to enjoy and being assaulted and threatened by teenage gangs may put more vulnerable people off using the park altogether. If they are prepared to threaten to hurt an animal then where might it lead?
    • Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
    • A quick Google says that it is not undersubscribed unlike many subject schools so those claims mentioned above may not be true. Last Ofsted was good.  You are definitely right about the money. This is what trusts do. Remove word ‘subject’ above Remove word ‘subject’ above I can’t edit my ridiculous errors but would like to apologise  for messy post
    • I have heard claims that people don't send their children there because of the name of the school..?  I genuinely cannot get my head around this one. The school is named after the road it is on which is named after the history of the area!  'Grove Primary School' is potentially the most boring name they could have come up with, and for a school struggling financially, is rebranding the school really the best use of funds? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...