I Kissed a girl

[*Bob*]

PHWOAR GET A LOAD OF 'ER I WOULDN'T MIND GIVIN' 'ER ONE DRIBBLE

Does anyone remember the days when you didn't have to sing about being lesbian-curious to make yourself sexier to the masses?

I'd choose pseudo-lipsticklezzies Tatu over her. At least their song was better and they don't look like they work the cheese counter at Asda on Saturday (and have a name to match)

[KalamityKel]

Whos a lesbian/curious?

[david_carnell]

I clearly need to shop at Asda more often.

And sex has always sold *Bob* - Elvis sure as heck used it. It's just that striaght sex no longer holds the curiousity it once did. To create any sort of media interest you need an angle. Some choose crime (gangasta rappers), homophobia (gangsta rappers) or misogyny (gangsta rappers) whilst our friend Katy chose lesbianism.

You didn't write that tAtU song did you *Bob*? I think I remember you bigging that up before. Very sly.

[*Bob*]

Me? No. I don't know who wrote it, but millionaire Trevor Horn added 'the magic'. As far as I know he doesn't live in East Dulwich.

And I don't know what counter they work on, but they'll need to wear a hair net.

[KalamityKel]

oooo I love wet T-shirt comps!

[jumpinjackflash]

KK, as a spectator or participant?

[*Bob*]

Or a judge?

[KalamityKel]

All of the above? ;-)

[James]

If only a straight man would come on here and admit to having kissed another bloke.

That would be far more interesting!

[Brendan]

Can?t say I have James but if it elicited the same reaction in teenage girls as two girls kissing does in teenage boys I I probably would have given it a go.

[SeanMacGabhann]

Another strike - Just spilled water over my keyboard

[Bellenden Belle]

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can?t say I have James but if it elicited the same

> reaction in teenage girls as two girls kissing

> does in teenage boys I I probably would have given

> it a go.

I think us girls are just a little too coy to admit it... but I think you may find it does indeed have the same effect...

[david_carnell]

It's a trap Brendan, don't fall for her cunning ways!

[mockney piers]

Haha, hadn't really bothered following this thread, but now I'm sooooooo glad I gave into curiosity (err so to speak).

Thanks you thank you *Bob*.

And if it was one of yours then hats off. It's majestically good pop even if a hook laden chorus looped 20,000 times shouldn't work, somehow it just does.

[RosieH]

The whole hetero girl on girl action thing just seems so very, hmm, undergraduate. "Look, look at me fellas, I'm kissing a girl".

The "I hope my boyfriend doesn't mind" line gives the game away a bit.

Not dangerous, not terribly interesting, but hell, while you're young and lissome,(and this cheesemonger does appear to be both), why not? You'll grow out of it love.

[Asset]

it may be undergraduate Rosie, but boys of any age just can't help lovin' it....

[RosieH]

You have a point there - even when they know it's solely for their benefit.and not a genuine sapphic moment.

Bah, maybe it's time to dig out the fruity lip balm

[Huguenot]

No they don't Asset. And you're a girl so how would you know?

[Brendan]

Surely the most worrying thing about that video is just how shockingly bad the song actually is. If I have to put up with a crime against music just for some girl on girl action I would rather go without thanks.

[LuvPeckham]

This is one of those genuine "WTF" moments in my life

I put up a video of a song that I like, and next thing I know there is a debate about Girl on girl, the use of lesbianism in videos to sell a song, group participation and so on....

like I said WTF.... thank god that Freddie Mercury didn't resort to pretending to be gay to sell his videos ("I want to break free" rests my case M'lord)

Yours in disbelief of Peckham borders !!!

[*Bob*]

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No they don't Asset. And you're a girl so how

> would you know?

I think the (alleged) straight hetero male's 'fascination' with two girls getting it on is a hangover from past censorship within the British and American porn industry.

Being illegal (as it was) to show boy-girl action in any sort of realistic way (a photo of a gentlemen with an orgasmic expression waving a floppy cock a good foot away from his partner didn't really cut the mustard) - jazz mags soon realised that having two girls, say, messily eating a melon with their knockers touching was a much better draw for their top-shelf readers. And so was perpetuated they myth of the 'lesbian fantasy'.

Personally I don't find it a turn-on at all. They should get a room.

[Asset]

Only going on what Mr. Asset tells me!

[*Bob*]

Obviously an ex-'Razzle' reader.

Check in the shed, underneath the the box which the lawnmower came in. Old habits die hard (so to speak).

[Asset]

Is that where you keep yours?

[lozzyloz]

....underneath the the box which the lawnmower came in....

Have you exposed y-y-y-y-your lawnmower fetish?