Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hmm. Mrs Kford's just had a call from our bank telling her that her Maestro card has just been used for a series of transactions in the Philipines. They cancelled it, and luckily it was on a couple of hundred quid. She's wracking her brain to rememeber where it was used, as she prefers the Barclay's ATM to the tampered-with HSBC. It would definitely be an ED cloning though, as she's only been local lately.
But it seems from a previous post on this thread that the police were not helpful - otherwise a certain petrol station near a certain roundabout would be shut by now. It seems the way forward is that banks will decline all transactions from foreign countries unless clients call ahead of time to inform them exactly where they are going. Also, having transactions texted to mobiles are a great idea, but some people would have a thousand texts!

I don't think the police/fraud investigators would just go in all guns blazing and shut somewhere down, would they, they'd want to watch and wait and make sure they had evidence and also try to trace the trail back to see exactly who was involved before arresting anyone??


Otherwise there would be time for the others involved to get away, no??


Not that I know anything at all about how the police or fraud departments work, lol!


I just know the police were mega uninterested when I had two cards stolen once :-S but that was a one-off, not like this epidemic now :-S


EDIT: Anyway you can't just shut somewhere down, it might be that the owner/manager/whoever had nothing to do with whatever was going on :)

Can I just say - always, always cover your PIN-entering hand. The attendant/server/waiter/waitress may not be looking, but those security camera's and other hidden cameras sure are. I was cloned once, about two years ago, and I learnt this lesson. Touch wood - I've not been cloned since. I also give the card entry slot a good waggle before using ATMs.


Having said that, there are reports coming out of ways to detect the PIN off the pad itself with compromised gear, but it seems that most PIN harvesting is still done visually.

Not exactly, Melbourne.


The notes themselves will be 'grown' in the stomach (from semi-digested organic pasta) and then sent to the left leg for printing, before making their final journey down the left arm for emission via a narrow slit, just before the palm of your hand.


All you'll have to do is 'think' your PIN number; although in emergencies (such as being too drunk to think) the cash can be accessed by keying-in a unique six letter password into a keypad located just below the scrotum. (The ladies will have their keypads in their handbags - for obvious reasons).

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not exactly, Melbourne.

>

> The notes themselves will be 'grown' in the

> stomach (from semi-digested organic pasta) and

> then sent to the left leg for printing, before

> making their final journey down the left arm for

> emission via a narrow slit, just before the palm

> of your hand.

>

> All you'll have to do is 'think' your PIN number;

> although in emergencies (such as being too drunk

> to think) the cash can be accessed by keying-in a

> unique six letter password into a keypad located

> just below the scrotum. (The ladies will have

> their keypads in their handbags - for obvious

> reasons).


Sounds painful, funny and sickening at the same time. ;-)

More cloning stuff........


I had a brand new ATM card for less than 5 weeks before it was cloned. In that time, locally, I used Sainsburys, Co-op, both ATM and shop, Somerfield (once), Lidl (twice), HSBC ATM, Poundstretchers (once), Iceland, Barclays ATM, Lloyds Pharmacy, Londis AND the Texaco petrol station. I can't remember where Londis is??


Anyway the Somerfield and Sainsbury link is there. Anyone else used any of the other places I used?

Prevention being the best cure n'all does anyone financially minded know which Bank(s) offer the best protection against this kind of fraud?


The spectrum of bank service experienced by myself and my flat mate has been quite wide in this instance.


My flat mates bank HSBC noticed a transaction taking place on foreign soil, outside of his usual spending pattern. They immediately cancelled the transaction, telephoned him and cancelled the card. The most inconvenience he will suffer is waiting for his new bank card to arrive.


My bank, Halifax, didn't notice anything amiss in a transaction occurring in another country. I however did but despite my protestations Halifax couldn't cancel the transaction, indeed I had to wait until the next day before Halifax was even able to tell me from what country the money was taken. Now I have to wait for up to 14 days for their fraud team to contact me, with no reassurance as to when or even if I will be refunded. Needless to say the money taken is money I need.


Have I just been unlucky in this instance? Or does the fraud prevention services between banks differ substantially?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...