Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hahaha, I dread the clocks going back (and forward), but my 15month old actually slept through and till 6.30 this morning (so a 5.30 start) which was brilliant as I was expecting his usual 5.15 (so 4.15 start:-/). Clearly he must be ill........


'Me time' pfft!

We changed our kids clock last night - at 6am (new time) they came into our room concerned that the clock was broken, as "we are sure it is getting up time now". We told them it was still nighttime, and off they went back to bed! Result. This parenting thing definitely gets easier when they're older.


Littlest one lies in her cot sucking her thumb until someone goes and gets her, not sure whether she noticed we were an hour late :)

mine do. I keep them on the same body-clock routine - so it's just an hour earlier to bed and an hour earlier to rise. plus we all just seem to go to bed earlier in the winter - surely a normal reaction to being dark so early!


i don't mean they go to bed ridiculously early though. in our house it means changing from 9pm to 8pm, and up at 6 rather than 7.


and I'm not talking toddlers - bit older now. so much easier!

kristymac1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hahaha, I dread the clocks going back (and

> forward), but my 15month old actually slept

> through and till 6.30 this morning (so a 5.30

> start) which was brilliant as I was expecting his

> usual 5.15 (so 4.15 start:-/). Clearly he must be

> ill........

>

> 'Me time' pfft!


Spooky, KristyMac, nearly the same name, and the same rising time! Except mine stuck to his usual 5.15, hence I got the 4.15 start yesterday... and today... *matchsticks*

amazingly yesterday my son slept til 6.30 (he is a 5am riser!) but today 4am he was ready to get up, obviously it wasnt going to happen which resulted in after me going in and trying to pat him back off to sleep him calling out endlessly for an hour - mama mama - whilst I laid awake praying he would sleep, he eventually went back off and slept til 6.45..


Ive always thought 5am was early but 4am is just rude!


x

4am start here today.

What did we do wrong?!!!

We stretched him last night til 7pm (so 8pm in his world and an hour later than his normal bedtime).

What time should we put him down tonight? I'm tempted to try 6pm, going with the sleep beget sleep theory.

Bizarrely he has only had 45 mins nap today and yet us in better spirits than normal.

I always find with baby strawbs if I try to put him in bed later than normal (normal bed time is circa 8.15) all that happens is he ends up with less sleep and is grumpy, it never results in him sleeping longer unfortunately. I am just going to persist with 8.15 (maybe 8.30) and then off to bed he goes, thankfully he always goes off without a problem its the sleeping through that is the problem.. x

We just keep on rolling in our house- have never tried to adjust bedtime to changing clocks, just adjusted ourselves to the clocks and put to bed at the time we normally would (regardless of whether this means bed an hour 'later' or 'earlier' than the previous day.


Seems to work for us, and less complicated than trying to do anything else!

Yes another 4 sm start here. Later bedtime doesnt work for us. At the moment baby Ivydale goes to bed about 6.30. He is so tired by then bless him all he wants is to sleep. He wakes at 5 (4 post clockchange) regardless of time he goes to bed. At leasr if he goes down at 6.30 I can do some house work and still get an early night. Then when he wakes up we cuddle, read books etc and at least I get to see him. Dont get me wrong, it is still torture I am just trying not to dispair and do the best that I can with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This presumably hasn't been done by vandals. It's hardly a Sycamore Gap situation. So if it's been done by professionals, unless it was a mistake (unlikely) there must have been a good reason, as it would have cost money. It would perhaps have been a good idea to put a notice on the tree explaining why such drastic work was done, but usually (I think) it would be either because of disease (often not noticeable on the surface) or that the roots or branches  were endangering nearby structures. As already said, nobody on here is likely to know. The tree department in Southwark Council are helpful in my (admittedly limited) experience. Please post on here when you have found out, as I agree what's left of the tree looks pretty odd. Depending on why the work was done, possibly they intend to remove the rest as well?
    • I have a very stupid question. I want to get a SIM card to put in an old mobile as a back up,  in case despite my best efforts my mobile gets stolen and I have no way of contacting anybody quickly, eg banks. Can I just buy any old cheap pay as you go  SIM card and put say ten pounds on it and it will then be fine for years (with the phone kept charged!) even if I don't use it, or do I have to use the phone  every so often to keep the SIM card valid?
    • I hate to see trees cut down to such an unfinished state. Unless the tree is home to wildlife, an effort should be made to remove & replace. Otherwise, it's just so useless & unsightly.
    • Given the level of care in Dulwich Park, I would not expect this to be careless or unnecessary. It will grow back.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...