Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi

we are about to buy a wide screen tv (finally giving in) and don't know too much about it.

our room is really bright (south-facing with huge windows). in this case is plasma better than

LCD? anything specific we should watch out for?


we are looking at the sonia bravia KDL46V3000 if that means anything to anyone. it is 1920 x 1080(p)

with a 16000:1 contrast ratio (all of which means little to me). are there websites that compare/rate/review

these things?


obviously technology not our strong point.

THANKS

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3784-advice-on-wide-screen-tvs/
Share on other sites

Hi there SST,

im a TV buyer for a retailer.

LCD will be brighter than plasma but it is less able to show a wide variation of dark and bright on the screen at the same time, thus darker colours appear 1 tone, when plasma can reproduce them far more lifelike in the many different tones as they were intended (eg the black bars on films appear grey on lcd, but black on a plasma, same with all other colours on the screen)


re contrast ratio, these are largely meaningless as the measure is so subjective, infact from the next generation of screens most manufacturers will drop the measurement after ***** manufacturer (in some peoples eyes) discredited it by quoting one of their screens at 500,000:1



If you absolutely must put your screen in direct sunlight then yes, the LCD would be best as it will go brighter, but if you want the best picture (lifelike, many colour tones, less motion blur) then go for a quality plasma like a Pioneer PDPD428XD or any Pansonic. A Palsma will function nearly aswell as LCD in bright direct sunlight.


Sony screens are good but Samsung is the market leader and some sonys (all until recently) were rebadged Sasmung's.

The model you list is a good model but check if the new 4000 model is available in 46" yet. Samsung make some excellent screens at that size and are worth considering.


A 46" screen is very large and you will need an exceptionally large lounge for it to not dominate. Consider you will need to be at least 4 meters away from the screen in order to not be able to see individual pixels (undesirable).


Screens are available online but willbe difficult to return if you have any problems. Much better to investigate online, go to a good store (john lewis/sevenoaks sound & vision etc) and get specific advice , armed with a web price for them to try to get close to.


Plasma screens cost more per " than LCD.

Panasonic now do a (TH42/46/50 pz81) model with a freesat hd tuer, which recieves high definition freeview through your sattelitle dish.


screens come in high def (720p) and full high def (1080p). Very little content is available in 1080p and the difference is not that significant, so full HD is a "nice to have" feature, not essential.


I could go on forever but dont want to confuse with too much info..


hope that helps. If unsure my view: Plasma will by far and away produce the best most lifelike picture. LCD will be cheaper, and go brighter 9if you feel that is desirable)


have fun


Will dex

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...