Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just wondered if anyone could advise. I consulted a solicitor 2 weeks ago. I had 30 mins of advice - I was told the rate was 235 an hour, and so I expected a bill of half that. I subsequently received an ema

Summary if advice, with several inaccuracies as to what I had told him, and now a bill

Of ?335- for 30 mums plus 40 Mins writing attendance record and email To me recording advice- at no point was this part mentioned not that I would be billed for it.


I am assuming since it is a solicitor there is no point arguing, but I feel completely done over. This is a huge sum for me and I can't pay it for 2 weeks-

I can't see anything on the bill

About when to pay it except immediately. I am planning to email him stating my unhappiness and explaining i will pay him in a fortnight and tht I hope no late fee will be charged.


Susyp

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/38077-solicitors-fees/
Share on other sites

A solicitor is obliged to clearly explain his/her fees to you, including the fact that any rates are always quoted exclusive of VAT. Did you sign an engagement letter of any sort with him? Were the fees clearly explained i.e. that any in-person meeting would be followed up with additional work (did you request he write down his advice to you)? If he didn't explain things to you adequately, then you certainly can challenge the invoice. There should also always be a grace period for payment.


Solicitors' Code of Conduct: http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/handbook/code/part2/


This might be helpful (as might contacting the SRA (Solicitors' Regulation Authority) if you really think you weren't advised properly): http://www.sra.org.uk/faqs/contact-centre/public/04-using-a-solicitor/How-can-I-find-out-how-much-it-will-cost-to-use-a-solicitor-.page


Good luck!

Solicitors always charge you the maximum they think they can get away with. "Venal" is the word to bear in mind.


I think what you do next depends on whether you intend to work with him over the coming months, or whether it was a one-off.

If I were you I would find someone else, anyway. The signs of this being a good working relationship aren't good.


The SRA makes it clear, so armed with the code of conduct you would have every reason to raise: not being told charges in advance; inaccuracies contained in his report; VAT omission; writing/email time extra; etc.


Another tactic (I used it successfully once) to make this pass quickly is to send them the amount you SHOULD have been charged, with a letter explaining why you consider their higher amount unjustified.

The firm then does a sum. They find it'll actually cost them a silly amount more to send you letters insisting they be paid the rest, than it would to accept your explanation and shut up.

Is it possible that your summary and charges weren't even written-up by the solicitor, but simply by a secretary who is billing you max as a default? Pay what you think you owe (half of ?235), including a letter noting shoddy work (inaccuracies in summary, etc), and tell them that your business relationship is now concluded. I agree with flOwer. It would cost them more to pursue this than just to let it go. And it doesn't sound like it would hold up in small claims court anyway. They're taking the p1ss. Be upfront and unapologetic.


How was the advice you did receive? Do you still need legal advice? I think there are a few Forumites who are solicitors. Maybe you can get a recommendation from someone here? Good luck. xx

I used house legal protection insurance to help me during the redundancy process, it was an add on to our buildings insurance policy. Something actually needs to have happened for it to kick-in i.e. I had to pay myself to consult a solicitor when it became apparent I was likely to be facing redundancy but once the formal redundancy notice had been issued - some 4 months later - then the policy kicked in. It doesn't apply for just seeking advice as foresight, which was a downer as I received great advice as to how to legally handle the forthcoming redundancy process.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...