Jump to content

Solicitors fees

susyp

By susyp
in The Family Room Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

susyp

susyp

Posted
Posted

Just wondered if anyone could advise. I consulted a solicitor 2 weeks ago. I had 30 mins of advice - I was told the rate was 235 an hour, and so I expected a bill of half that. I subsequently received an ema

Summary if advice, with several inaccuracies as to what I had told him, and now a bill

Of ?335- for 30 mums plus 40 Mins writing attendance record and email To me recording advice- at no point was this part mentioned not that I would be billed for it.


I am assuming since it is a solicitor there is no point arguing, but I feel completely done over. This is a huge sum for me and I can't pay it for 2 weeks-

I can't see anything on the bill

About when to pay it except immediately. I am planning to email him stating my unhappiness and explaining i will pay him in a fortnight and tht I hope no late fee will be charged.


Susyp

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/38077-solicitors-fees/
Share on other sites
devsdev

devsdev

Posted
Posted

A solicitor is obliged to clearly explain his/her fees to you, including the fact that any rates are always quoted exclusive of VAT. Did you sign an engagement letter of any sort with him? Were the fees clearly explained i.e. that any in-person meeting would be followed up with additional work (did you request he write down his advice to you)? If he didn't explain things to you adequately, then you certainly can challenge the invoice. There should also always be a grace period for payment.


Solicitors' Code of Conduct: http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/handbook/code/part2/


This might be helpful (as might contacting the SRA (Solicitors' Regulation Authority) if you really think you weren't advised properly): http://www.sra.org.uk/faqs/contact-centre/public/04-using-a-solicitor/How-can-I-find-out-how-much-it-will-cost-to-use-a-solicitor-.page


Good luck!

fl0wer

fl0wer

Posted
Posted

Solicitors always charge you the maximum they think they can get away with. "Venal" is the word to bear in mind.


I think what you do next depends on whether you intend to work with him over the coming months, or whether it was a one-off.

If I were you I would find someone else, anyway. The signs of this being a good working relationship aren't good.


The SRA makes it clear, so armed with the code of conduct you would have every reason to raise: not being told charges in advance; inaccuracies contained in his report; VAT omission; writing/email time extra; etc.


Another tactic (I used it successfully once) to make this pass quickly is to send them the amount you SHOULD have been charged, with a letter explaining why you consider their higher amount unjustified.

The firm then does a sum. They find it'll actually cost them a silly amount more to send you letters insisting they be paid the rest, than it would to accept your explanation and shut up.

Saffron

Saffron

Posted
Posted

Is it possible that your summary and charges weren't even written-up by the solicitor, but simply by a secretary who is billing you max as a default? Pay what you think you owe (half of ?235), including a letter noting shoddy work (inaccuracies in summary, etc), and tell them that your business relationship is now concluded. I agree with flOwer. It would cost them more to pursue this than just to let it go. And it doesn't sound like it would hold up in small claims court anyway. They're taking the p1ss. Be upfront and unapologetic.


How was the advice you did receive? Do you still need legal advice? I think there are a few Forumites who are solicitors. Maybe you can get a recommendation from someone here? Good luck. xx

Mrs TP

Mrs TP

Posted
Posted
I used house legal protection insurance to help me during the redundancy process, it was an add on to our buildings insurance policy. Something actually needs to have happened for it to kick-in i.e. I had to pay myself to consult a solicitor when it became apparent I was likely to be facing redundancy but once the formal redundancy notice had been issued - some 4 months later - then the policy kicked in. It doesn't apply for just seeking advice as foresight, which was a downer as I received great advice as to how to legally handle the forthcoming redundancy process.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By malumbu · Posted

      The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Dell Autos is closing tomorrow

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • HeadNun
      Oh David / Is David Lammy Toast?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • malumbu
      The economy, a sensible debate in advance of the budget

      By malumbu · Posted

      @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...