Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...some inexplicable

> council office that never seems to be open (like

> Foxton's used to be)? >

>

>

Wasn't Foston's the location of the DSS office, rather that some inexplicable council office? That served a useful function when there were more people signing on in East Dulwich. Since the DSS office closed, people have to trek all the way to Peckham. And we are left with Foxton's.

BigED - you are right. Apologies, I was being flippant. I should have namechecked ex-Threshers.


Unlurked - all of those things could be valuable, though I fear they may still attract people to the area.


On a more serious note, I'm not sure we are short of health centres in the immediate area and I would have thought the police counter could go in lots of places - lack of will not space is the constraing factor (and actually the hall is about 5x larger than required for this). As for a community space, I don't think the hall was all that well-used before it was closed (and yes, I had been there myself). Father Gerry's posting goes through this in some detail.

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tallulah71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > unlurked all you ever do is 'counterbalance'

> what

> > the OP is saying of any topic.

> >

> > It's a bit boring, to be honest. Just say what

> you

> > think -

>

> 'Tis my opinion. Don't read it then. Also there is

> the fleapit in Peckham that the ED film club use.

> Further reason why a cinema is not needed, nor

> should it have been wooed by 1 local politico. Nor

> will it keep yoof off the streets. Arguments for

> it are ridiculous IMO.



I'd like to go somewhere local that isn't a fleapit to watch a film.


Also, I don't think that saying the space could be used as a police counter is a useful comparison - it's not a matter of someone inviting the cinema and not the police to use the space and in any event, as has already been pointed out, it's far too big.


I think it would be great to bring something new to the area - ie not another pub / coffee shop etc.

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

TJ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone know whether the cinema is going ahead, or

> is it another urban myth aka Waitrose?


xxxxxxx


Well whether it goes ahead or not, it is hardly an urban myth, since our local councillor James Barber says that two cinema chains had been in discussion with the hall owners .....


Unless you think that James is in the business of peddling myths? Hardly a good re-election ploy, I would suggest ....

This is a great idea! Moved to ED a couple of years ago, love the area, but a new cinema would really add something, particularly to that end of Lordship Lane. A small cinema doesn't just show films but also provides a great space for the community to meet and hold creative events (short film nights, Q&As etc).
  • 3 weeks later...

yeknomyeknom Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My belly just did a flip flop. I am so

> excited!!!!!



Omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg !!!!!!!

*does tippy toe over excited running on the spot acton with eyes squeezed closed and jazz hands held aloft *

Well there is a bit "courtyard" (for want of a better word) space behind it, so if they're building on all of that land, then yes 3 screens sounds reasonable.


Very good news, will be a very welcome addition to the area. Imagine they'll do great business so long as they price reasonably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...