Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...some inexplicable

> council office that never seems to be open (like

> Foxton's used to be)? >

>

>

Wasn't Foston's the location of the DSS office, rather that some inexplicable council office? That served a useful function when there were more people signing on in East Dulwich. Since the DSS office closed, people have to trek all the way to Peckham. And we are left with Foxton's.

BigED - you are right. Apologies, I was being flippant. I should have namechecked ex-Threshers.


Unlurked - all of those things could be valuable, though I fear they may still attract people to the area.


On a more serious note, I'm not sure we are short of health centres in the immediate area and I would have thought the police counter could go in lots of places - lack of will not space is the constraing factor (and actually the hall is about 5x larger than required for this). As for a community space, I don't think the hall was all that well-used before it was closed (and yes, I had been there myself). Father Gerry's posting goes through this in some detail.

unlurked Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tallulah71 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > unlurked all you ever do is 'counterbalance'

> what

> > the OP is saying of any topic.

> >

> > It's a bit boring, to be honest. Just say what

> you

> > think -

>

> 'Tis my opinion. Don't read it then. Also there is

> the fleapit in Peckham that the ED film club use.

> Further reason why a cinema is not needed, nor

> should it have been wooed by 1 local politico. Nor

> will it keep yoof off the streets. Arguments for

> it are ridiculous IMO.



I'd like to go somewhere local that isn't a fleapit to watch a film.


Also, I don't think that saying the space could be used as a police counter is a useful comparison - it's not a matter of someone inviting the cinema and not the police to use the space and in any event, as has already been pointed out, it's far too big.


I think it would be great to bring something new to the area - ie not another pub / coffee shop etc.

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

TJ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone know whether the cinema is going ahead, or

> is it another urban myth aka Waitrose?


xxxxxxx


Well whether it goes ahead or not, it is hardly an urban myth, since our local councillor James Barber says that two cinema chains had been in discussion with the hall owners .....


Unless you think that James is in the business of peddling myths? Hardly a good re-election ploy, I would suggest ....

This is a great idea! Moved to ED a couple of years ago, love the area, but a new cinema would really add something, particularly to that end of Lordship Lane. A small cinema doesn't just show films but also provides a great space for the community to meet and hold creative events (short film nights, Q&As etc).
  • 3 weeks later...

yeknomyeknom Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My belly just did a flip flop. I am so

> excited!!!!!



Omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg omg !!!!!!!

*does tippy toe over excited running on the spot acton with eyes squeezed closed and jazz hands held aloft *

Well there is a bit "courtyard" (for want of a better word) space behind it, so if they're building on all of that land, then yes 3 screens sounds reasonable.


Very good news, will be a very welcome addition to the area. Imagine they'll do great business so long as they price reasonably.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...