Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Another tragedy. My sympathies to his family and friends.


As someone who cycles daily to and from Victoria, the issues surrounding cycling saftey are numerous. A few thoughts below:


- Cycling infrastructure is poor to atrocious. There are almost no segregated cycle lanes and the sooner major junctions are given "cyclist priority" phased lights the better;


- Cyclists can be their own worst enemy. I see far too many "bike ninjas", all dressed in dark clothes and no lights going as fast as possible, weaving through traffic. In an urban environment I'm ambivilent about the benefits of high-vis but wearing headphones seems utterly bonkers despite what DJKQ will tell you;


- The arguments continue to be a vicious circle. Cyclists will continue to ride in aggressive-defensive manner until roads are designed with them in mind and drivers begin to recognise us as legitimate road users. BUT by not riding in a courteous and sensible manner cyclists continue to damage their own reputation, endanger their own safety and the chances of better infrastructure provision;


- Drivers are still poor at 'thinking bike' and appreciating vulnerable road users. I think further training as part of the driving/HGV test on cycle awareness is a good start;


- I don't like the way that it is deemed to constantly be the requirement of cyclists to 'make' themselves safe i.e. helmet, high-vis, endless lights etc etc. It would be as ridiculous to ask all cars to be painted white as they are easier to spot in the dark. Or for every driver to wear fire proof overalls to eliminate any deaths due to fire in crashes. Pedestrians aren't expected to dress like a quarterback to cross the road despite the inherent danger in doing so and the high number of pedestrian deaths every year. The heaviest burden or responsibility for safety should rest with those in charge of the vehicles causing the most harm in an accident from HGV to car to motorcycle to bicycle to pedestrian in that order.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another tragedy. My sympathies to his family and

> friends.

>

> As someone who cycles daily to and from Victoria,

> the issues surrounding cycling saftey are

> numerous. A few thoughts below:

>

> - Cycling infrastructure is poor to atrocious.

> There are almost no segregated cycle lanes and the

> sooner major junctions are given "cyclist

> priority" phased lights the better;

>

> - Cyclists can be their own worst enemy. I see far

> too many "bike ninjas", all dressed in dark

> clothes and no lights going as fast as possible,

> weaving through traffic. In an urban environment

> I'm ambivilent about the benefits of high-vis but

> wearing headphones seems utterly bonkers despite

> what DJKQ will tell you;

>

> - The arguments continue to be a vicious circle.

> Cyclists will continue to ride in

> aggressive-defensive manner until roads are

> designed with them in mind and drivers begin to

> recognise us as legitimate road users. BUT by not

> riding in a courteous and sensible manner cyclists

> continue to damage their own reputation, endanger

> their own safety and the chances of better

> infrastructure provision;

>

> - Drivers are still poor at 'thinking bike' and

> appreciating vulnerable road users. I think

> further training as part of the driving/HGV test

> on cycle awareness is a good start;

>

> - I don't like the way that it is deemed to

> constantly be the requirement of cyclists to

> 'make' themselves safe i.e. helmet, high-vis,

> endless lights etc etc. It would be as ridiculous

> to ask all cars to be painted white as they are

> easier to spot in the dark. Or for every driver to

> wear fire proof overalls to eliminate any deaths

> due to fire in crashes. Pedestrians aren't

> expected to dress like a quarterback to cross the

> road despite the inherent danger in doing so and

> the high number of pedestrian deaths every year.

> The heaviest burden or responsibility for safety

> should rest with those in charge of the vehicles

> causing the most harm in an accident from HGV to

> car to motorcycle to bicycle to pedestrian in that

> order.



Agree totally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm fairly sure everyone engaged with this topic will have received this email yesterday, but just in case... "To whom it may concern, We are reaching out to invite you to our upcoming Residents & Stakeholder Drop In Sessions for Gala 2026. We are hosting two drop-in style sessions (one virtual, and one in person) to facilitate more in depth conversations, allowing us to run through our plans for 2026 and to discuss how we are going to address your feedback. We look forward to meeting you in person or online and discussing our event plans for both Gala and On The Rye Festival in more detail. Evening Session (IN PERSON): Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Date: Wednesday 11th February Location: Watson's General Telegraph Lunchtime Session (VIRTUAL MEETING): Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM Date: Friday 13th February We are offering 15 minute slots to speak directly with us in a virtual meeting. Please confirm your availability within this drop in period and we will confirm a time with you. You will then be sent a link directly to join the virtual session. If you would like to attend, please respond with: Your name: Your address: If you will be attending the virtual or in person meeting: Your availability for a meeting time online (if applicable): If you have any access needs so we can accommodate: We really appreciate your feedback and taking the time to attend our engagement meetings. Yours sincerely, Community Team | GALA Festival"
    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...