Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Another tragedy. My sympathies to his family and friends.


As someone who cycles daily to and from Victoria, the issues surrounding cycling saftey are numerous. A few thoughts below:


- Cycling infrastructure is poor to atrocious. There are almost no segregated cycle lanes and the sooner major junctions are given "cyclist priority" phased lights the better;


- Cyclists can be their own worst enemy. I see far too many "bike ninjas", all dressed in dark clothes and no lights going as fast as possible, weaving through traffic. In an urban environment I'm ambivilent about the benefits of high-vis but wearing headphones seems utterly bonkers despite what DJKQ will tell you;


- The arguments continue to be a vicious circle. Cyclists will continue to ride in aggressive-defensive manner until roads are designed with them in mind and drivers begin to recognise us as legitimate road users. BUT by not riding in a courteous and sensible manner cyclists continue to damage their own reputation, endanger their own safety and the chances of better infrastructure provision;


- Drivers are still poor at 'thinking bike' and appreciating vulnerable road users. I think further training as part of the driving/HGV test on cycle awareness is a good start;


- I don't like the way that it is deemed to constantly be the requirement of cyclists to 'make' themselves safe i.e. helmet, high-vis, endless lights etc etc. It would be as ridiculous to ask all cars to be painted white as they are easier to spot in the dark. Or for every driver to wear fire proof overalls to eliminate any deaths due to fire in crashes. Pedestrians aren't expected to dress like a quarterback to cross the road despite the inherent danger in doing so and the high number of pedestrian deaths every year. The heaviest burden or responsibility for safety should rest with those in charge of the vehicles causing the most harm in an accident from HGV to car to motorcycle to bicycle to pedestrian in that order.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another tragedy. My sympathies to his family and

> friends.

>

> As someone who cycles daily to and from Victoria,

> the issues surrounding cycling saftey are

> numerous. A few thoughts below:

>

> - Cycling infrastructure is poor to atrocious.

> There are almost no segregated cycle lanes and the

> sooner major junctions are given "cyclist

> priority" phased lights the better;

>

> - Cyclists can be their own worst enemy. I see far

> too many "bike ninjas", all dressed in dark

> clothes and no lights going as fast as possible,

> weaving through traffic. In an urban environment

> I'm ambivilent about the benefits of high-vis but

> wearing headphones seems utterly bonkers despite

> what DJKQ will tell you;

>

> - The arguments continue to be a vicious circle.

> Cyclists will continue to ride in

> aggressive-defensive manner until roads are

> designed with them in mind and drivers begin to

> recognise us as legitimate road users. BUT by not

> riding in a courteous and sensible manner cyclists

> continue to damage their own reputation, endanger

> their own safety and the chances of better

> infrastructure provision;

>

> - Drivers are still poor at 'thinking bike' and

> appreciating vulnerable road users. I think

> further training as part of the driving/HGV test

> on cycle awareness is a good start;

>

> - I don't like the way that it is deemed to

> constantly be the requirement of cyclists to

> 'make' themselves safe i.e. helmet, high-vis,

> endless lights etc etc. It would be as ridiculous

> to ask all cars to be painted white as they are

> easier to spot in the dark. Or for every driver to

> wear fire proof overalls to eliminate any deaths

> due to fire in crashes. Pedestrians aren't

> expected to dress like a quarterback to cross the

> road despite the inherent danger in doing so and

> the high number of pedestrian deaths every year.

> The heaviest burden or responsibility for safety

> should rest with those in charge of the vehicles

> causing the most harm in an accident from HGV to

> car to motorcycle to bicycle to pedestrian in that

> order.



Agree totally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...