Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Exactly my point- why put the burger on at all; or put the burger on at ?10?


'Lobster' as a restaurant name is just as catchy



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't understand the burger and lobster

> concept.

> > If I'm reading it right you pay ?20 and can

> have

> > either a lobster or a burger.

> >

> > Who in their right mind would pay ?20 for a

> burger

> > and queue for the privilege?

>

> Guess what - you queue for the ?20 lobster, not

> the ?20 burger. The burger is probably there for

> anyone who doesn't want lobster but almost

> everyone seemed to be on lobster.

I went to B&L with someone who had the burger and frankly it was the best burger I've tried. Other folk's have the same opinion.


B&L is a major success story and it's no snake oil. The chefs in the other restaurants in the group told the owner that his concept wouldn't work and even they've been proved wrong. So credit to him.

jimbo1964 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had one of those in Maine once.. A McLobster.

> Delicious.


Oh well.. there goes my new money spinning idea.. :-(


There really IS a McLobster?



http://www.mcdonalds.ca/content/dam/Canada/en/product_pages/burgers-sandwiches/hero/hero_mclobster.png


I suppose there just had to be...


Foxy..

Peckhamrye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate to spoil the fun but there are 3 items on

> the Lobster Burger menu - Lobster, Burger and a

> Lobster roll....


Indeed. But why anyone would want to put lobster in a burger bap is beyond me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • One of the issues is that under this government, the so called black hole of £20 billion has, according to some, risen to £50 billion. Which will result in even more taxes. I was always taught to cut my coat according to my cloth, which would in an ideal world mean having to halt or stop projects or services until the deficit is down to a manageable level. Increasing taxes has a limit (the Laffer Curve https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve)  and also damages the economy and the publics ability to spend.  If Labour want to turn things around they are going to have to face some uncomfortable decisions on where to cut their ambition.
    • "Country before Party" is Starmer's motto. Lucy Powell, Burnham and other senior cabinet ministers briefing against Starmer, describing the situation as 'terminal', and publicly condemning him is not putting the country first. They'll be no better than the Tories if they enforce on us a new PM and the political dissatisfaction of the electorate will explode.  Labour needs to get its house in order, but there are too many factions and, just like the Tories at the end, it doesn't know what it is anymore. I think the situation is unsolvable.   
    • I saw that too but it was already sold unfortunately -  so if anyone else has one they’re not using I’m still interested! Thanks!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...