Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It has been confirmed this happened in Tessa Jowells constituency, clearly stated NOT in the Dulwich half of her constituency.


James Cracknell ‏@JollyJourno 13m

I can confirm the location of yesterday's Lambeth 'slavery' arrests was in the constituency of Tessa Jowell - Norwood/Tulse Hill/Herne Hill.


James Cracknell ‏@JollyJourno 10m

Tessa's constituency is split between Southwark and Lambeth but the arrests were in the Lambeth half - not Dulwich.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/38723-3-women-enslaved/
Share on other sites

Maybe more newsworthy at present is that the Freedom charity says it has been approached by many more people since this story broke.

A gradual discovery that enslavement can happen anywhere, because as a spokesperson said on radio this morning, it is a fairly easy crime to conceal.

What a strange post, not sure what response the poster is looking for.


Anyhow this isn't really a revelation, there have been several programmes on TV about slavery in the past year or two. It's sad that in this day and age it still goes on, especially without others in the same street knowing anything about it. We have isolated ourselves so much, maybe we should be more aware of our neighbours. Sad to say gone are the days of people knowing everybody in their street.

Well it has been revealed on BBC News that the house they were found in wasn't built 30 years ago.


This would mean that they would all of moved at sometime if the story is credible.


Also revealed that the women were allowed out of the house at times.


Neighbour revealed that on one occasion when he knocked at their door all 5 occupants came to the door.


So there are a lot more questions to answer.


DulwichFox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...