Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It has been confirmed this happened in Tessa Jowells constituency, clearly stated NOT in the Dulwich half of her constituency.


James Cracknell ‏@JollyJourno 13m

I can confirm the location of yesterday's Lambeth 'slavery' arrests was in the constituency of Tessa Jowell - Norwood/Tulse Hill/Herne Hill.


James Cracknell ‏@JollyJourno 10m

Tessa's constituency is split between Southwark and Lambeth but the arrests were in the Lambeth half - not Dulwich.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/38723-3-women-enslaved/
Share on other sites

Maybe more newsworthy at present is that the Freedom charity says it has been approached by many more people since this story broke.

A gradual discovery that enslavement can happen anywhere, because as a spokesperson said on radio this morning, it is a fairly easy crime to conceal.

What a strange post, not sure what response the poster is looking for.


Anyhow this isn't really a revelation, there have been several programmes on TV about slavery in the past year or two. It's sad that in this day and age it still goes on, especially without others in the same street knowing anything about it. We have isolated ourselves so much, maybe we should be more aware of our neighbours. Sad to say gone are the days of people knowing everybody in their street.

Well it has been revealed on BBC News that the house they were found in wasn't built 30 years ago.


This would mean that they would all of moved at sometime if the story is credible.


Also revealed that the women were allowed out of the house at times.


Neighbour revealed that on one occasion when he knocked at their door all 5 occupants came to the door.


So there are a lot more questions to answer.


DulwichFox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...