Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > keeping a dog in the city is generally

> antisocial

>

>

> That's a bit OTT. Many would argue the opposite.


OK. I casually overstated it. That said... my guess would be that a large number of people will have been kept awake by a barking dog at some point, trodden in their sh*t, or been intimidated by an aggressive canine whilst in a public place. Of course there are a majority of responsible owners, but unfortunately there is no restrictions on who can buy a dog.


Is it generally undesirable to have (at least large) dogs in a modern, densely populated city? It is a strange quirk of history / our culture that we don?t think it weird. Should someone want to keep a similar sized animal in a small flat, or terraced house (such as a pig, or a sheep) we?d probably question their good sense and it?s potential to cause a nuisance more freely.


That said, I wouldn?t want dogs banned, of course not. It would be good if people were generally a bit more conscious of how they affect others though. Most of the time, when a dog has jumped up at me whilst I?ve been out running or started licking my face as I sit in their owners home - I?ve been told things like ?he?s just saying hello?, or ?ah, he?s giving you a kiss?. Well no, no he is not giving me a kiss, he is being poorly controlled by someone who irrationally personifies their pet.


[Edited after reflecting on others comments]

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> first mate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > rahrahrah Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > keeping a dog in the city is generally

> > antisocial

> >

> >

> > That's a bit OTT. Many would argue the

> opposite.

>

> OK. I casually overstated it. That said... my

> guess would be that a large number of people will

> have been kept awake by a barking dog at some

> point, trodden in their sh*t, or been intimidated

> by an aggressive canine whilst in a public place.

> I would also bet that a significant number of

> ?urban dogs? don?t get two walks a day, don?t have

> enough company during working hours, or sufficient

> space to run around in. Of course there are a

> majority of responsible owners, but unfortunately

> there is no restrictions on who can buy a dog.

>

> Is is generally undesirable to have (at least

> large) dogs in a modern, densely populated city?

> It is a strange quirk of history / culture that we

> don?t think it weird. Should someone want to keep

> a similar sized animal in a small flat, or

> terraced house (such as a pig, or a sheep) we?d

> probably question their good sense and it?s

> potential to cause a nuisance, more freely.

>

> Dogs are bred to have characteristics we find

> pleasing and that are tradable (even where it

> leads to health problems for the animal). They're

> bought for many reasons (fashion, or

> companionship) but fundamentally for the owners'

> pleasure, no one elses. We all do things for the

> benefit of ourselves of course, sometimes causing

> inconvenience to others ? but let?s not pretend

> it?s anything else... It?s not socially beneficial

> to keep animals as pets.

>

> That said, I wouldn?t want dogs banned, of course

> not. It would be good if people were generally a

> bit more conscious of how they affect others

> though. Most of the time, when a dog has jumped up

> at me whilst I?ve been out running or started

> licking my face as I sit in their owners home -

> I?ve been told things like ?he?s just saying

> hello?, or ?ah, he?s giving you a kiss?. Well no,

> no he is not giving me a kiss, he is being poorly

> controlled by someone who irrationally personifies

> their pet.



This statement is up there amongst the most ridiculous things I've read for some time:


- Do you have any evidence to back up your "assumptions" on dogs getting enough walks or having enough room?


- How does our relationship with dogs have anything to do with "a strange quirk of history"?


- I was going to address all of the unfounded and subjective comments that you've posted but I can't be bothered...


Unbelievable!

Pets can appear to be beneficial to people's health, so saying it's not socially beneficial to keep pets is incorrect.


Benefits to people's health is always a benefit to society:


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130509163902.htm


http://www.docstoc.com/docs/48365516/THE-BENEFITS-OF-PET-OWNERSHIP


http://petsfortheelderly.org/research.html#5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...