Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I couldn't get out the e3nd of Maxted the other night after being trapped behind an overseas coach!


The thing got stuck turning onto Nutbrook let alone onto Adys.


I think it comes from the Peckham Lodge and is trying to get out onto the South Circular or similar and the satnav takes it thru narrow residential streets. Utter madness. It blocked traffic in three directions. Good jnob it was late at night and not rush hour tbh.


Others have seen HGVs come up and down. It's crazy but not sure how you could stop it. What would be the alternative route for them? Along to Camberwell and down Dog Kennel Hill I guess....

  • 1 month later...

Mrs TP Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw the council guys taking the taller bollard

> out yesterday and asked them what was going on,

> they said it is to be replaced with another bell

> bollard like the one by the postbox side - fingers

> crossed!



That what they said last time!!

I honestly believe that they put the bell bollard on the wrong corner and just dont want to admit it!!!

And so the story continues......... :)

  • 1 month later...
Well, the new half-bell bollard, which is already covered in paint scrapes, caught its first victim today - an Astravan was impaled on it, wedged solid, with the bollard stuck inside the nearside wheel arch and its tyre popped. The driver was attempting futilely to rock his van off it, to no avail.

It's the second I have seen. A guy a couple of weeks ago got the middle of his car stuck on it - one wheel either side.


Cross that they have driven over the payment but also sympathetic. Is it really so much worse than the other corners around here? Does Amott and Adys have the same probs?

Much less traffic there as it's not the route through to Bellenden and out onto Peckham High Street.


Giant European coaches ferrying teens from the Peckham Lodge don't help the situation by getting wedged in small streets with parked cars either side. I've raised the issue with Cllr James Barber.

Oh yes coaches. We had a Dutch teacher from a coach knock at our door recently at 9.30pm asking if we could move a car so their coach could get around the corner from Maxted into Nutbrook. I agreed to move it but pointed out that they wouldn't actually be able to get around the Nutbrook / Ady's corner further along. The driver went off to investigate and realised there was no way he could do it so tried to go the other way down Nutbrook but then hit the bollard at the top of Maxted outside the converted corner shop. It was all a bit of a mess and they ended up blocking up the junction for about 20 mins. He said he had made one wrong turn and then all had gone wrong following the sat nav re-routing. I felt really sorry for them. Much better signage is needed ahead of those tight corners.

I've suggested signage. And talking to the owner/manager of the Lodge to instruct drivers to go along to Camberwell and around and down Dog Kennel Hill.


You can't install width restrictors since the shops on Bellenden Road will sometimes need deliveries from large lorries.

Oh dear just passed a couple examining the damage to their car, scrapped all down the passenger side on the bottom panel beneath the car doors. The driver said he didn't see the bollard as too low :( I noticed all the tarmac is cracked around the bollard too, not really sure how much more it will take. However, glad the bollard is stopping pedestrians from being hit as cars take the corner too tightly.
It's a curious one because the junction is not really so narrow that vehicles should have problems navigating it. The raised road to kerb level probably doesn't help but there seems to be a lot of poor drivers making the same mistakes at this junction.

Agree there's a lot of terrible drivers who can't successfully negotiate busy roads and tight corners, I avoid Adys at all costs during rush hour because it's jammed with people who try and queue closely behind the car in front rather than see the traffic coming the other way.


Saw a coach getting stuck up Maxted earlier in the week. Almost comical. Definitely deserving of 'no coaches' signage, probably at the bottom of Lyndhurst.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The thing is, if vehicles are being driven so

> carelessly I'm rather glad the bollard is there

> rather than it being a person getting swiped.



As I said earlier, pedestrians wouldn't be hit if the pavement was left how the Victorians designed it. They'd be on the original pavement, rather than a build-out and cars would be able to negotiate it, like every other corner in the area.


It's poor design, pure and simple, and the bollard is a problem put there to solve another problem, at our expense.

I disagree. Cars simply drive too fast, too poorly and without due care and attention. If this reduces speed so much the better. And no one who's hit it will do it again. Everyone who lives nearby knows to negotiate that corner slowly.


We shouldn't be designing our urban streets with car drivers in mind.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...