Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi

We are looking at moving out of East Dulwich. Does anyone have any recommendations for an area that serves a young family looking for good schools, commute into London and a nice sociable village feeling.


Any ideas would be much appreciated


Thanks

The age old question! Although when we do eventually move we won't be tied to a London commute so our thoughts are slightly different.


Spent the day in Lewes today, absolutely gorgeous, has almost everything we'd want - although would love slightly lower house prices and the sea to run through the town ;)


We also like Whitstable/Tankerton and Broadstairs, and much further afield Bristol/Clevedon, Totnes and areas of Cornwall.


Meanwhile we stay on in South East London and do enjoy it. One day!

I've written about this before but anyway...we have moved out to a village in between Orpington and Sevenoaks. The commute to London Bridge/Cannon St/Charing Cross is fast and in some cases a non stop 18 mins, we have a village green, pub and amazing village school with class sizes of 12. Villages like Shoreham/Otford/Halstead/Knockholt are all close by and similar (some bigger/smaller/nearer etc). I think the Otford line goes to Victoria/Blackfriars.


But despite lots of positives (and overall I am starting to admit it has been a good move for us as a family) we do still miss ED nearly 2 years post move!


Good luck - it's so hard and depends on so many things (work location/family etc).

Having moved to Lewes.....ooooooh 8 days ago (but spent a lot of time there in last 6 months) I can confirm streets are very quiet of an evening but the pubs and restaurants are lively enough


Definitely doesn't compare to lordship lane bustle of an evening but time comes when that's a good thing

We are hoping to move to St Albans this year. There are some lovely parts of Kent we thought about but our families are North and West so we didn't want to move any further away from them. Lovely place with good, co ed secondary schools (our 2 are only 2 and 4 at the moment though). Mr C7 will commute to Canary Wharf. Lots of trains to London Bridge, fastest 25 min. Housing is cheaper than ED but that's not saying much. Bit sad to be leaving but we have outgrown our flat and can't afford a house! Good luck with your search.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having moved to Lewes.....ooooooh 8 days ago (but

> spent a lot of time there in last 6 months) I can

> confirm streets are very quiet of an evening but

> the pubs and restaurants are lively enough

>

> Definitely doesn't compare to lordship lane bustle

> of an evening but time comes when that's a good

> thing



Are you commuting to london?have thought about lewes and close by but cannot see an evening return train that doesn't take less than about 2 hours with 2 changes?

I am commuting and so far so good. Average train journey 1 hour with a bit of walking either side


I used to bus from ed, so that could often be in same ballpark


Depends where you work tho. I'm in blackfriars and walk to london bridge. 20 mins and good excercise in a sedentary job. Than london bridge train is less than an hour direct (Lewes bound). At commuting times


Trooping down from ed itself makes the journey more complicated

We commute from surrey on a slow (but cheap) train line to london victoria / bridge, takes 75-90 mins door to door. Advantages: nice house with garden (not an option for us in ED), great childcare options (cheaper too), public services and trades are less stretched (eg never a problem getting GP appointment), we can do stuff by car at weekends without getting stuck in traffic. Less pollution. Nice for small children (although so is london of course). Cinema, leisure centre, big DIY shops, town with high st shops all 5 mins drive away.


Disadvantages: commuting so long is exhausting and is "dead time" (neither work nor home), the area is really quiet at night, no good local restaurants/take-aways, everyone drives everywhere, rubbish public transport. suspect this area wouldn't be great for teens.


I miss the ED parks a lot. We have some good green spaces, but they are wilder, no public loos or lattes!

Sounds nice, what villages would you recommend?


snowboarder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've written about this before but anyway...we

> have moved out to a village in between Orpington

> and Sevenoaks. The commute to London Bridge/Cannon

> St/Charing Cross is fast and in some cases a non

> stop 18 mins, we have a village green, pub and

> amazing village school with class sizes of 12.

> Villages like Shoreham/Otford/Halstead/Knockholt

> are all close by and similar (some

> bigger/smaller/nearer etc). I think the Otford

> line goes to Victoria/Blackfriars.

>

> But despite lots of positives (and overall I am

> starting to admit it has been a good move for us

> as a family) we do still miss ED nearly 2 years

> post move!

>

> Good luck - it's so hard and depends on so many

> things (work location/family etc).

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yup. But the changes at east croydon or Hayward's

> Heath after that only add 10 minutes



Thanks. Do you know much about the schools? I am fairly relaxed on primary schools but have never heard anything good about state secondary schools on the south coast?

a few years away from having to worry about secondary schools so haven't given it much thought yet (who knows what changes the next 5-10 years will bring to education system? Seems little point worrying about it until then)


But the average teenager walking the streets seems pretty sound and undamaged

How about berkhamsted? It's our intended next stop as our families are in the midlands so kent takes us further away. Pretty pricey though and when we tried to move there a few years ago we gave up in the end as houses were at such a premium the agents weren't even doing viewings unless you'd already sold your own house. Which we hadn't. Still it's a lovely small town with quick train into Euston. Good schools too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
    • I think the accusation derives from the Greens mobilising the Muslim vote, hence engaging in sectarian politics. But happy to be corrected    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...