Jump to content

Reports of overly paranoid middle-class types in East Dulwich


Recommended Posts

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow, some fairly aggressive responses to a few

> snarky comments about the middle classes of ED.

>

> One might conclude that a nerve or two were being

> touched!


Let's start a racist thread and see if that's better received shall we? Bigotry is bigotry, regardless who is on the receiving end.

El Pibe Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------


> Hardly. Looks more like belittling some 0/10

> twattish trolling to me.


That was the effect I was aiming for. The OP left him/her self wide open to a good belittling.

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wow, some fairly aggressive responses to a few

> > snarky comments about the middle classes of ED.

> >

> > One might conclude that a nerve or two were

> being

> > touched!

>

> Let's start a racist thread and see if that's

> better received shall we? Bigotry is bigotry,

> regardless who is on the receiving end.



So you really think the comments of the OP are on a par with racist abuse of an often disadvantaged minority?

It just makes me laugh when people get so angry at middle-class stereotypes which although might be mildly offensive (not that I think these are), don't have any discernable negative impact on their employment / education / life prospects etc.


The strength of the reactions to this stuff always amuses me.

If racism / sexism / homophobic comments were not son unacceptable in today's society, the OP would have used them LadyD.


He started this thread purely to get a rise, which he (surprisingly given the quality of his effort) got.


Most of us are just taking the piss out of a poor attempt at trolling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...