Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sorry, I feel like I am asking things every week now. It is just that I did not plan to do potty training for a while yet so havent got a clue what I am doing.


Out of nowhere my son who will be two in March has started to insist to "wee wee toilet". I was pretty shocked by this but took him to the toilet and we were both proud beyond belief when he did his thing.


A couple of hours later same little voice goes "mummy toilet now". Same thing happend he did his thing to lots of praise from us.


So where do I go from here? Should I build on his current fascination and just go for it? Or follow my plan and wait? He is starting nursery soon, have just stoped his dummy etc and I didnt want him to have too many major changes for him at once. There truly is no rush at all for me to get him potty trained. But sine he is clearly really enjoying this, feel really proud and pleased with himself would it be wrong to delay it.


Does anyone have any potty training advice? I am clueless

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/40549-toilet-training-advice-please/
Share on other sites

I'd go for it. You can always stop and try again later if it is a disaster. I potty trained my son at 2 1/3 because he had seen his cousin do it and was really keen. I was a bit reluctant to be honest as had just had no 2 but in the end just went with it and it was really smooth. I explained what we were doing and that he wasn't going to be wearing nappies any more as he was a big boy so he had to tell me when he needed a wee or poo etc. We went together to choose him some big boy pants. They have a little car on the front so he knows which way round to put them on -easier than plain. We did a sticker chart which he enjoyed, although we forgot about it quite quickly. Also at first I still put a nappy on him when we went out, which made it less stressful for me. Also for the first couple of days I just let him run around with a bare bum as I found he was more likely to forget if he was wearing pants. Good luck! And if it is a nightmare don't be afraid to give up and come back to it later.

I would go with it. Be child led. If he is expressing an interest that is preferable to later trying to interest a reluctant potty trainee in my book.

Our daughter was 2.8, at least, when we began in earnest. She had a new sibling so likewise I was reluctant to introduce a new thing on top of big changes, but due to positive peer pressure at child minders she asked to wear knickers so we went with it. Some may consider that old, I figured we'd sort it out before she started school so wasn't going to sweat it.

He may change his mind, he may not, but if he sticks with it that saves a fortune in nappies. If he changes his mind you still have a foundation to build on in the future. I would be really proud of him for trying at this age.

Like people have said above - definitely go for it, especially as it wasn't a one off and he actually did a wee in the toilet both times. Little kids can show interest in toilets having seen adults/older kids do it, but it can take a while to make the connection between brain and bladder to wee in it too. He's already crossed a major hurdle. You now need to decide which way to do it, which will probably be more based on circumstance than anything:

1) cold turkey - take daytime nappies off and never look back, literally don't put a nappy on again unless they are going to nap/sleep - plan to have a few days/a week at home and then slowly venture out with travel potty's etc after that with lots of changes of clothes - we did this with no.1 and first couple of days had her on the potty/toilet once or twice and hour, then slowly through the week spaced this out. By the end of the week I could tell when she was needing to go so we would rush to the toilet, then about another 2-3 weeks for her to confidently be able to tell me most of the time when she needed to go.

2) The way most nurseries do it - keep nappies on, but do the same as above --> take them to the potty/toilet often initially and then space it out, and then once they are showing signs of needing the toilet/knowing when they want to go, the nappies can come off.

3) a mix of both, which is useful if you can't have a week off work when potty training begins (which is what we are doing now with no.2) - have nappies off at home when you're there, but at nursery they will do the keep the nappy on but regular toilet trips thing, until the time is right to get them off permananetly.

It can be a gruelling process initially but always a relief when you come out the other side.

We used lots of praise/chocolate buttons as rewards and the first couple of days with the cold turkey style, we employed the services of Pingu (whilst she sat on the potty!).

Good luck xxxx

p.s. with no.1 we did cold turkey style when she first showed signs of being interested in the toilet, but after 3 days, there was still obviously no connection about what was needed and we were heading towards battles so we stopped, put nappies on and didn't talk about toilets again for a while. We tried again in exactly the same way 2 months later and it was a completely different process. So there is no harm in trying and having to give up for now if necessary. Just keep the process stress-free
So glad I came across this thread full of invaluable advice! My 2 year old daughter is fascinated with the loo also at the moment and always tells me when she's done a wee or poo, so I'm gonna be on lockdown at home this week in the hope that we can do it all with minimal stress. Its also good to know that I shouldn't panic if it doesn't work and go back to it in a couple of months!

Hi Midivydale,


It sounds like your little man is telling you he is ready or at least ready to start leaving nappies behind. Keep on praising him and go for it! if he has a few accidents (and he will:) that's OK it is all part of him learning and as others have said if it doesn't work out right now you can always leave it and try again in a few weeks/months


good luck


x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...