Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have two kids at a local Harris secondary school, and they love it. They are happy, motivated, have good friends and many excellent teachers. I find the staff responsive and engaging, able to treat parents like partners in their child's education. I am can only speak from a personal experience , not the preferred EDF method of read it in the paper, heard it in the playground, my nan knows someone who teachers there source.


For those of you that love a link check out this one about Harris Westminster six-form collaboration.

http://www.harrisfederation.org.uk/uploads/campus/38_31_13543-harris-westminster-sf-prospectus.pdf

TE44, hopefully I can clarify the point around "purchasing" places.


Alternative provision Free Schools and academies (and, soon, all state APs) are funded at a per place base level by central government. This gives them some financial stability, as obviously the student population goes up and down much more than a mainstream school. Where a school, LA or other referring body wants to send a student there, they "purchase" a place by paying a top up fee. For Harris Aspire, the expectation is that most places will be purchased by Harris schools (presumably because they designed it to be the right size for the approx. number of referrals they make per year for students this school might be suitable for) but other schools, LAs and commissioners will also be able "purchase" places by paying the top up fee. This model of a cluster of mainstream schools running AP is increasingly common, so there's nothing unusual going on as far as I'm aware.


I should add that I'm in no way associated with Harris but I work closely with a lot of academies and Free Schools so spend a lot of time looking at this stuff!



TE44 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://cds.bromley.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?MId

> =4445

>

> I didn't realise Harris Aspire Academy for

> alternative education opened last Sept. If you

> scroll to 22c on link above.

> I find it quite confusing, it seems to be saying

> there will be a charge unless children are

> referred from a harris academy. Sorry if this has

> been discussed already, if so can you tell me

> where. Link below for Harris aspire academy.

> arris offering alternative schools and moving

> children from mainstream, must be closely

> monitered in light of the

> question around stats.

>

> http://www.harrisaspire.org.uk/653/your-questions

> -answered

My experience of ap for year 11 pupils is that they are transferred to the Ap prior to the January census and so their results count against the ap rather than against the school.


My reading of the Harris Aspire ap is that they do indeed transfer pupils off of the original school roll.

Thanks CGPC Are you saying that soon all state run AP's will be funded by central goverment, whhilst at the moment

it is by local authority. Is there any difference between pupil referral units (PRU) and alternatuve provision (Ap)

It has only came to my notice that a reccomendation was put forward that most pru's convert to academies by 2018.


http://education.gov.uk/schools/pupilsupport/behaviour/a00216844/fund-staff-leg-prus

  • 1 year later...

Interesting article in the Guardian last month on this issue


http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/oct/13/schools-harris-academy-teachers-ofsted


and the Inside Croydon blog


http://insidecroydon.com/2015/11/17/hundreds-of-teachers-leaving-harris-academies-each-year/#comment-23455


Thrown into sharp relief when you see the comment above from Sophiesofa


"My top tip for parents/kids looking round potential schools is to ask what the staff turnover is like. Don't just rely on Ofsted and results".

Inside croydon is a well known leftist attack dog...and the Labourites are against their schools being taken out of L.A. control. However, with a Tory government schools are vulnerable to the cuts at the front line imposed by Labour councils- so they are better off out of L.A. control.

Staff turnover in London is not a very good indicator because if you have worked in an inner city school, especially London schools with the inherent challenges - then you have a much better chance of promotion elsewhere......

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Inside croydon is a well known leftist attack

> dog...and the Labourites are against their schools

> being taken out of L.A. control. However, with a

> Tory government schools are vulnerable to the cuts

> at the front line imposed by Labour councils- so

> they are better off out of L.A. control.

> Staff turnover in London is not a very good

> indicator because if you have worked in an inner

> city school, especially London schools with the

> inherent challenges - then you have a much better

> chance of promotion elsewhere......


Theses levels of turnover are some way above comparative schools in the UK, academy or not. The issue here is Harris.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...