Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, My last property was above a shop in Notting Hill It was on a busy road but I loved it-The shop closed at 5.30pm and on Sunday's so I could dance up and down my living room and not worry about noise..something I was unable to do in my previous place a conversion flat in a house. Like you I found it was my only option in that postcode (W10) to get what I wanted, and I was pleasantly surprised at how much higher the ceilings were and generally how much more space I got buying above a shop.

I wouldn't buy above a cafe but my flat was next door to a food and wine shop that was open until 11pm and I had no problems, it was also great in terms of having items delivered as the shops were always happy to take them in, if anything I felt very safe as I knew the shops had CCTV and fire alarms which lots of domestic properties don't have.

I honestly can't remember any negatives to be honest, and I made money on the property when I sold it after 3years even though the market was on a down turn at the time. Though I would say location is key.

hope this helps...good luck!

natalieh101 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone have any advice or experience of

> buying over commercial premises? We're aware of

> the pitfalls in terms of change of use and any

> downturn in the market - but, prices have gone so

> crazy, it seems like our only option!Thanks in

> adance


Be very very careful, could have health impacts. A friend moved above a bakers and put a lot of weight on in a short amount of time!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Arguably, as regards local needs for free(er) flowing traffic and some acknowledgement of expressed wishes he hasn't been. The 'active travel' and particularly the cycling lobby seems to have got far more of his attention than others. In that aspect, at least he would seem to be far more likely to be happy amongst the avowedly private-car hating Greens. A perfectly reasonable stance, of course, but one which certainly doesn't qualify as 'arguing for local needs'. He hasn't, equally, been very obviously supportive of those, his direct constituents I believe, who have been less than enthusiastic about Gala.
    • The problem with the first Southwark leadership election is that two proxy votes were cast, which is against Southwark's own party rules. So that is why the election was re-run. The controversy is in switching to an online as opposed to in person second election. James has causes he vehemently stands for, and it's fair enough if he thinks the local Labour Party is no longer for him. Government is not easy, and there are hard decisions to be made always. London councils have always had a better deal when it comes to central funding, and anyone who travels to the North frequently can see the stark difference. It's that failure to see the bigger picture that I find most surprising about his comments. Sure, as a local councillor he should be always arguing for local needs, but reform of central government funding to give more help to poorer regions has been a long held aim by this Labour Party, and especially since Brexit, where poorer regions benefitting from EU grants lost out.  As always, it will be the public that decides at the ballot box. 
    • I'd be interested to know how else you award points when deciding what party to vote for!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...