Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well I can honestly say that I have never lifted a finger to anyone.

Had 2 fights,both within 2/3 weeks of each other in 1964,a mere 44 years ago, in the same place, i.e.St.Peters Park,Liverpool Grove,Walworth(sigh! the great memories of my roots)...they both lasted one punch(Tony Pickering and Billy Furze(R.I.P) if you must know) and they both ended up with me rolling around and clutching my stomach on the floor.:))

Thus endeth a promising(NOT!) fighting career...(tu)

Slow to respond, other side of the world an' all that.


Well put SMG. MR, total sympathy. Points taken both..... but what a couple of inconsequential examples.


Women didn't get the vote because of Pankhurst and horse races. They got it because they weren't prepared to work in arms factories without it. The cotton pickers didn't get emancipation because America got liberal, they got it because the Amercian Dream doesn't work when the means to production is on a go-slow.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this count as abuse?

> I asked my lodger(who had got hold of the remote)

> to please turn the sound down for a moment as I

> was going to use the phone "for a few seconds".I

> smiled as I said it and no-one could question the

> manner or attitude that I said those words.

> Those are EXACTLY the words I used,as well.

> With that she threw my Sky Remote at my face and

> caught me(I'm not lying) a half inch below my

> eye.I dread to think the damage that could have

> done to me.

> 2 days later we visited her big Sister who was

> returning to the rest of their Family in

> Kingston,Jamaica.

> My "friend" was the personification of the

> sweetest Girl that you could wish to meet! Even

> her voice was much softer.

> Just a quick question..if I had thrown the remote

> at her face,missing her eye by a half-inch would

> anything have come of it,I wonder?


Amazing how your "lodger" turned into your "friend"...

Good morning/afternoon Huguenot!


Again, true as far as it goes. Apartheid in South Africa didn't end because Jerry Dammers wasn't "gonna play Sun Cit-tay" either.... but in all cases the groundwork had been done. Most could have been refuted if the years previously hadn't been filled with the relevant demands and growing public opinion.


It's why whenever an argument about the environment is raised and the point "what we the little guy do is of no consequence - it's only when big business and government do something will there be any real impact" - which is of course true, but it's only when forced by "the little guy" do the big battle-ships slowly turn circle. If the little guy hadn't done his bit, however ineffective, then the behemoths would never even need to think about changing course

Well (simplistically) apartheid in South Africa ended when the unchallengeable hold on power that the National Party, who instigated the policy of apartheid, came to an end.


This ended mainly because of the fall of the Soviet Union. America no longer needed to control the government of the most powerful country in a region that was otherwise predominately Soviet influenced and coordinated. So they pulled their backing from the National Party and only then did public opinion take its course. So unfortunately it was, as most things are, for reasons of political power rather than humanitarianism.


To be honest though I don?t think anyone ever really gave a toss about what anybody in Britain thought.


Unless they were pursuing future careers as Guardian contributors.

KalamityKel Wrote:

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

> I asked my lodger(who had got hold of the

> remote)....

> > My "friend" was the personification of the

> > sweetest Girl that you could wish to meet!

Amazing how your "lodger" turned into your

> "friend"...


No comment about the deed itself?

Your only comment is that my Lodger was also a friend?..Are the two mutually exclusive?

Brendan Wrote:

Well (simplistically) apartheid in South Africa

> ended ....

To be honest though I don?t think anyone ever really gave a toss about what anybody in Britain thought.


So all those thousands of hours protesting outside South Africa House in Trafalgar Square during the 1970's where in vain?

Read an interesting internet debate 2 years ago on the most prominent UK Black Forum when 2 Moderators asked "Why was it nearly always only "Whites" that bothered to protest!"

The answers were "many and varied" to say the least!::o

The recent reports about the abuse Sol Campbell received from Spurs fans at Portsmouth has been illuminating - not because it's news (it's being going on for ever) but because fans who claim to not be racist ("we cheered Defoe - how can we be racist?") use very specific racist and homophobic references to deride someonem, which is what this thread is about.


They could (if they are still childishly upset about his defection 7 feckin years ago!!!) call him a traitor, disloyal, etc but instead they - in front of children, and on a weekly basis - make KKK references and HIV references as a way of calling someone, to use Jame's term, "shit"


Does no-one think that at least some of those kids will absorb the notion that maybe black peolpe and gay people deserve everything they get? Despite protestations to the contrary I don't think the adults are that clear...


Sol Campbell and some fans reactions



over to the music thread with this one surely??


(Some decent singles and mostly dreadful albums. Despite Tony Visconti's involvement)


As for the Sol Campbell reference - when Spurs fans sing (to the tune of Lord of the Dance) :


Sol, Sol, wherever you may be,


Not long now til lunacy,


And we couldn't give a f***,


When you're hanging from a tree,


Judas **** with HIV.



----------------------------


Does that underline James' point? Or is it acceptable football/social banter? Should it not be challenged?

well it depends on which gospel youread and how you interpret them - I would almost be impressed if people chanting the above had read the lines:


"Now this man purchased a field with the

reward of iniquity; and falling headlong,

he burst asunder in the midst, and all

his bowels gushed out.

19 And it was known unto all the dwellers

at Jerusalem; insomuch as that field is

called in their proper tongue, Aceldama,

that is to say, The field of blood.

"


and surmised - yep, definitely hanging. I would argue that at least the younger members of the crowd satisfy themselves that it's what happens to uppity folk in the wrong part of town...


But let's say they are referring to Judas - hey, it proves James' point! racism = less acceptable than homophobia! ;-)

I think you are right, and right again. But also think most people would think they knew Judas hung himself without having read the Gospels.


Anyway, the chants are horrible. Speculating on the exact nature of their horribleness is rather pointless (even though I started it, I know).

That's anti-semetism rather than racism.


On a serious note, the saddest thing I ever witnessed was about 20 years ago on the terraces when the more moronic element of fans made 'monkey noises' whenever a particular opposition player had the ball. The irony was, one of our best players at the time was a young black chap; even more poignant was that a lad (about 12) of mixed race heritage was joining in the chanting.

Worse than that,I'mafraid.:X

When my team played at WBA,they possesed the first ever Black Forward Line= Laurie Cunningham(RIP), Cyrille Regis, Garry Thompson et al..and the fans took boxes of hundreds of bananas that were flung,in unison ontothe pitch near the start.

No, I don't know how they got thru' the turnstiles either!

Seen worse than Mixed-Raced kids joining in.I've actually witnessed several Black fans joining in the nonsense.(6)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...